*It is the case of bolting the barn door, after the horse has already fled.
*
*
*
*America under Bush has already done immense damage to Muslim nations,
Muslim civilians by force of arms and its anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim
propaganda had demonized the Muslim world. *
*
*
*Now that Obama is trying to mend both the armed invasions and the
anti-Muslim propaganda, the actions by people like Faisal Shahzad appears as
trying to wound an already wounded soldier. It is more like revenge.*
*
*
*Let us try and get the wounded soldier to surrender in peace.*
*
*
*Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
*
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: D. Pipes Mailing List <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 10:58 AM
Subject: #1022 Pipes: "Faisal Shahzad, Jihadi, Explains Terrorism" in NRO
To: [email protected]



   <http://www.danielpipes.org>
Daniel
Pipes

*June 25, 2010*
   Homepage <http://www.danielpipes.org>    |
Articles<http://www.danielpipes.org/articles>
|     Blog <http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/>  You can follow Daniel Pipes
and the Middle East Forum on their
*Facebook*<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Middle-East-Forum/76783091854/>and
*Twitter* <http://www.twitter.com/meforum> pages.
Please take a moment to visit and log in at the subscriber
area<http://www.danielpipes.org/list_edit.php>,
and submit your city & country location. We will use this information in
future to invite you to any events that we organize in your area.
Faisal Shahzad, Jihadi, Explains Terrorism

* by Daniel Pipes
National Review
Online<http://article.nationalreview.com/437111/faisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism/daniel-pipes>
June 25, 2010*

*http://www.danielpipes.org/8536/faisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism*
  Send <http://www.danielpipes.org/article_send.php?id=8536>
Comment<http://www.danielpipes.org/8536/faisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism#comment_submit>
RSS <http://www.danielpipes.org/rss.xml> Share: [image:
Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.danielpipes.org%2F8536%2Ffaisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism>
[image:
Twitter]<http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.danielpipes.org%2F8536%2Ffaisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism&service=bit.ly&source=DanielPipes>
[image:
Google 
Buzz]<http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.danielpipes.org%2F8536%2Ffaisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism>
[image:
Digg]<http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.danielpipes.org%2F8536%2Ffaisal-shahzad-jihadi-explains-terrorism&title=Faisal+Shahzad%2C+Jihadi%2C+Explains+Terrorism&bodytext=Jaw-dropping+court+testimony+by+Faisal+Shahzad%2C+the+would-be+Times+Square+bomber%2C+singlehandedly+undermines+Obama+administration+efforts+to+ignore+the+dangers+of+Islamism+and+jihad.+Shahzad%27s+forthright+statement+of+purpose+stands+out+because+jihadis%2C...>

Jaw-dropping court testimony by Faisal Shahzad, the would-be Times Square
bomber, singlehandedly undermines Obama administration efforts to ignore the
dangers of Islamism and jihad.

Shahzad's forthright statement of purpose stands out because jihadis, when
facing legal charges, typically save their skin by pleading not guilty or
plea bargaining. Consider a few examples:

   - Naveed 
Haq<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2006/08/seattle-responds-to-its-jihadi-naveed-haq>,
   who assaulted the Jewish Federation building in Seattle, pleaded not guilty
   by reason of insanity.
   - Lee 
Malvo<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2003/08/the-beltway-snipers-motives>,
   one of the Beltway Snipers, explained that "one reason for the shootings was
   that white people had tried to harm Louis Farrakhan." His partner John Allen
   Muhammad claimed his innocence to the death chamber.
   - Hasan 
Akbar<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/04/hasan-akbars-chilling-diary-entries>killed
two fellow American soldiers as they slept in a military compound,
   then told the court ""I want to apologize for the attack that occurred. I
   felt that my life was in jeopardy, and I had no other options. I also want
   to ask you for forgiveness."
   - Mohammed 
Taheri-azar<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2006/03/more-on-the-north-carolina-jihadi-mohammed>,
   who tried to kill students on the University of North Carolina by running
   over them in a car and issued a series of jihadi rants against the United
   States, later experienced a change of heart, announced himself "very sorry"
   for the crimes he committed, and asked for release so that he can
   "re-establish myself as a good, caring and productive member of society" in
   California.

These efforts fit a broader pattern of Islamist
mendacity<http://www.danielpipes.org/378/islamists-not-who-they-say-they-are>;
rarely does a jihadi stand on principle. Zacarias Moussaoui, 9/11's would-be
twentieth hijacker, came close: his court proceedings began with his
refusing to enter a plea (which the presiding judge translated into "not
guilty") and then, one fine day, pleading guilty to all charges.

Shahzad, 30, acted in an exceptional manner during his appearance in a New
York City federal court on June 21. His answers to Judge Miriam Goldman
Cedarbaum's many inquisitive questions ("And where was the bomb?" "What did
you do with the gun?") offered a dizzying mix of deference and contempt. On
the one hand, he politely, calmly, patiently, fully, and informatively
answered about his actions. On the other, he in the same voice justified his
attempt at cold-blooded mass murder.

The judge asked Shahzad after he announced an intent to plead guilty to all
ten counts of his indictment, "Why do you want to plead guilty?" a
reasonable question given the near certainty that guilty pleas will keep him
in for long years in jail. He replied:

I want to plead guilty and I'm going to plead guilty a hundred times forward
because – until the hour the U.S. pulls it forces from Iraq and Afghanistan
and stops the drone strikes in Somalia and Yemen and in Pakistan and stops
the occupation of Muslim lands and stops killing the Muslims and stops
reporting the Muslims to its government – we will be attacking [the] U.S.,
and I plead guilty to that.

Shahzad insisted on portraying himself as replying to American actions: "I
am part of the answer to the U.S. terrorizing [of] the Muslim nations and
the Muslim people, and on behalf of that, I'm avenging the attacks," adding
that "We Muslims are one community." Nor was that all; he flatly asserted
that his goal had been to damage buildings and "injure people or kill
people" because "one has to understand where I'm coming from, because … I
consider myself a *mujahid*, a Muslim soldier."

When Cedarbaum pointed out that pedestrians in Times Square during the early
evening of May first were not attacking Muslims, Shahzad replied: "Well, the
[American] people select the government. We consider them all the same." His
comment reflects not just that American citizens are responsible for their
democratically elected government but also the Islamist view that, by
definition, infidels cannot be
innocents<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/08/can-infidels-be-innocents>
.

However abhorrent, this tirade does have the virtue of truthfulness.
Shahzad's willingness to name his Islamic purposes and spend long years in
jail for them flies in the face of Obama administration efforts not to name
Islamism as the
enemy<http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2001/09/not-calling-islamism-the-enemy>,
preferring such lame formulations as "overseas contingency operations" and
"man-caused disasters."

Americans – as well as Westerners generally, all non-Muslims, and
anti-Islamist Muslims – should listen to the bald declaration by Faisal
Shahzad and accept the painful fact that Islamist anger and aspirations
truly do motivate their terrorist enemies. Ignoring this fact will not make
it disappear.

*Mr. Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube distinguished
visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University.*

*Related Topics:*  Muslims in the United
States<http://www.danielpipes.org/topics/13/muslims-in-the-united-states>,
Radical Islam <http://www.danielpipes.org/topics/27/radical-islam>,
Terrorism <http://www.danielpipes.org/topics/40/terrorism> *This text may be
reposted or forwarded so long as it is presented as an integral whole with
complete information provided about its author, date, place of publication,
and original URL.*

You are subscribed to this list as *[email protected]*.
To edit your subscription options, or to *unsubscribe*, go to
http://www.danielpipes.org/list_edit.php
To *subscribe* to this list, go to
http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php
   (Daniel Pipes sends out a mailing of his writings 1-2 times a week.)

Sign up for related (but non-duplicating) e-mail services:
   Middle East Forum (media alerts, event reports, MEQ articles)
   Campus Watch (research, news items, press releases)
at http://www.danielpipes.org/list_subscribe.php

*DanielPipes.org* <http://www.danielpipes.org>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to