*Orissa Government and POSCO Have Misled the Public on Benefits to the
Country, says New International Report*

A team of US-based researchers have released a report today claiming that
the POSCO project in Orissa is fundamentally flawed and economically
unviable, and that the company and the government of Orissa have
deliberately misled the public by putting forth false data and numbers.
Coming close on the heels of the divided report of the POSCO Enquiry
Committee, where the majority of members held that the POSCO project is
illegal, the new report, *Iron and Steal: The POSCO-India Story *(
Backgrounder<http://miningzone.org/campaigns/posco/iron-and-steal-backgrounder/>,
Executive Summary<http://miningzone.org/campaigns/POSCO/iron-and-steal/ch00/>),
authored by the *Mining Zone People’s Solidarity Group
(MZPSG)*<http://miningzone.org>,
goes a step further.  It argues that apart from violations of law and
procedure, the POSCO project has been justified based upon deeply flawed
numbers with benefits exaggerated and costs purposefully minimized. “This
sorcery of flawed numbers has been perpetrated on the country by the
Government of Orissa, POSCO and the National Council for Applied Economic
Research (NCAER),” said Dr. Girish Agrawal, a California-based lawyer and
civil engineer experienced in large infrastructure projects, who is a member
of MZPSG and one of the authors of the report.

*Iron and Steal* is a data-rich and comprehensive report, which has received
the endorsement of several renowned intellectuals including Amit Bhaduri
(Prof. Emeritus of Economics, JNU), Prashant Bhushan (Advocate, Supreme
Court) and Manoranjan Mohanty (Prof. of Political Science, Delhi
University). At the press conference today, Shankar Gopalakrishnan, with the
Campaign for Survival and Dignity, said that the very reason that the POSCO
steel plant was mainly located on forest land was that at the time of the
signing of the MoU in 2005, the government could simply hand over the forest
land to any company, without giving any thought to people dependent on it.
It is only after the Forest Rights Act (FRA) came into effect in 2006 that
the rights of forest dwellers have been recognized and this is what makes
FRA compliance so hotly contested in the region.  Prof Amit Bhaduri pointed
out that in the current neoliberal environment, the political leadership is
only interested in promoting a climate for investors, even at the cost of
all democratic norms and constitutional rights.  Commenting on the report,
Prof. Mohanty said that *Iron and Steal *is “the most comprehensive, most
persuasive, the best researched report on the POSCO Project.”

While substantiating the various illegalities and procedural irregularities
in granting clearances to the project, *Iron and Steal* suggests that the
very reason for the violation of democratic principles and lack of
transparency is that the base data on which the project is justified is
itself wrong and therefore could not be allowed to come out.  *Iron and
Steal* concludes that the POSCO project has been allowed to proceed without
a basic socio-economic study, a complete blockade on discussion of the
current local economy, wild exaggerations of benefits and a deliberate
overlooking of infrastructural and ecological costs. The primary findings of
the report include:

   - the existence of a thriving agrarian economy that the Government of
   Orissa has refused to acknowledge in Coastal Jagatsinghpur with average
   annual net yields of over Rs. 40,000 per decimal of land (100 decimals = 1
   acre) per year in sharp contrast to the paltry Rs. 11,500 per decimal being
   offered as one time compensation by the GoO/POSCO,
   - gross exaggeration of employment benefits, EIRR and tax revenues by the
   Orissa, POSCO and NCAER,
   - deliberate and systematic procedural violations for environmental and
   socio-economic impact assessment by both the government of Orissa and POSCO,
   - failure to conduct a socio-economic study that would measure the impact
   of 22,000 people being displaced and  more than 50,000 people being affected
   by the project in coastal Jagatsinghpur and Khandadhar hills.

“A betel vine farmer with just five decimals of land generates a net monthly
income of Rs.13,000 to Rs. 17,000 depending on the season and can at best be
employed at minimum wage as unskilled labor in the POSCO plant if he loses
his land,” said Biju Mathew, Associate Professor of Business from New
Jersey, USA who led one of the two MZPSG research teams into Orissa in
July/August of this year to collect data that could be used to compare the
current betel vine-led economy of the region with the proposed POSCO-led
economy. “And the employment picture isn’t exciting either. POSCO, the
Government and NCAER have all been claiming that the project will generate
8.72 lakh jobs. That’s just a plain lie. The maximum direct jobs that the
project will generate in the next 5-10 year period is about 7000 jobs, less
than 1% of the current Orissa unemployment rate” he added.

The report’s *coup de grace* is its finding that the tax revenue claims
advanced by the Government of Orissa based on NCAER’s figures are clearly
fraudulent. In an attempt to make the project look attractive, *I&S* shows
how NCAER has systematically fudged the tax data, and how the Government has
just blindly accepted its figures. “Both the tax revenue calculations and
the EIRR estimates of NCAER are deeply flawed” said Shalini Gera, who was
also part of the MZPSG team that visited Orissa. “For instance the positive
appraisal of the project’s Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) is based
on the use of maximal figures on revenue and minimum figures on costs,
including the complete exclusion of the costs of roads, railway, port and
township. However, this should not surprise us as NCAER has taken money from
POSCO and is badly compromised,” she added.

Similarly, the mining profits that POSCO will make are nothing short of a
free bonanza for POSCO. Apart from exclusive mining rights in Khandadhar for
the extraction of ore at dirt-cheap royalty rates for its Indian steel
plant, the GoO has promised an additional 400 million tons of iron ore for
POSCO’s South Korean steel plants. Given the sky-rocketing price of
iron-ore, even the most conservative estimates will allow POSCO to recoup
its entire India investment within the first 8 years of operation.

*Iron and Steal* has also compiled environmental data from multiple Indian
and international sources, and finds that the flawed environmental approval
processes followed have resulted in grave environmental issues being
overlooked. These include the possible disappearance of the thriving
Paradeep port, an impending water crisis in the Mahanadi delta and
Khandadhar mining areas, and severe negative impacts on already threatened
wildlife species. “The perversion of the EIA process by numerous violations,
the subsequent failure of the process to capture public concerns, and the
continuing resistance by the people are all similar to the Nagarjuna case
earlier this year in A.P. which led to large-scale violence” said Anu
Mandavilli, MZPSG environment researcher. The report assesses the
environmental consequences of the project, including irreversible ecological
damage, and argues that environmental destruction must be understood through
the language of human rights.

With the release of *Iron and Steal*, MZPSG has also announced the launch of
its international information campaign on the POSCO India project. Thus far,
the POSCO project has only been hyped as India’s largest FDI and much has
been written about the scale of the project in terms of its captive mines in
Khandadhar, and integrated plant and port in coastal Jagatsinghpur. The
objective of the report is to focus on the real data around the POSCO
project and increase the awareness within the international community about
problems with the project.
*The Mining Zone People’s Solidarity Group is an international research
group focused on India, with core interests in the “new economic policy” and
development model in India. We do not seek or accept any funding from
external sources and all expenses are paid for by the researchers
themselves. We have been following the development of several large projects
in India, and for the last six months, we have been investigating claims
made by the central and state governments about the benefits to the country
due to the proposed POSCO integrated steel project and captive port in
Orissa. Contacts us at <[email protected]**>*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to