The cost of doing good in India is death , incarceration , intimation
& harassment.  Please read the story of Binayak Sen , Himanshu Kumar &
many others who are bearing the cost of being good in a vile
vindictive system.

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main48.asp?filename=Ne260211Coverstory.asp

he danger of Being good

The miracle of individual choice may be what is keeping us safe as a
society. Some people just choose to be good, no matter what. This is
the story of what happens to them

SHOMA CHAUDHURY
MANAGING EDITOR


ILLUSTRATION: ANAND NAOREM

THERE IS a dark truth about Indian democracy that very few middle-
class Indians understand. There are no certitudes about liberty and
opportunity here; no real comforts about the rule of law. In fact, the
nature of life in India, literally, is a function of choice.

Nothing demonstrates that more than the story of Dr Binayak Sen. Four
years ago, on a cold February morning outside a court in Raipur, a man
with gentle eyes and a long grey beard had pressed his face through
the iron grill of a jail van and spoken urgently as I stood outside on
my toes, straining to hear him. Gun-toting commandos surrounded the
van. It had not been easy to push past them to get face time. No one
had really heard of Binayak Sen then. It was the first time someone
from the national media had come listening. There were many things Sen
could have pleaded through that window. He had already been in jail
for nine months. He could have urged one to talk up his story in
Delhi’s power circles, urged one to start a campaign for him. But,
astonishingly, Sen’s urgencies had lain elsewhere.

“You have to go back and write about how we are creating two
categories of human beings in this country,” he had said, as the
commandos tried to nudge us out of range. “You have to write about the
famine and malnutrition rampant everywhere. We are living out the
Malthusian theory...”

This did not sound like a man who was a dire national security threat.
But Sen had been put in jail for “waging war against the nation” and
it took another year and more for him to get bail from the Supreme
Court. The freedom was shortlived. On 25 December 2010, a trial court
convicted him and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Sen was re-
arrested. Last week, the Chhattisgarh High Court refused to suspend
the sentence and denied him bail again. He may not have waged war
against the nation, it said, but he stood guilty of sedition: Why had
he raised his voice against the State?

Binayak Sen could have chosen not to be in jail. Jethwa could have
chosen not to be dead

Sen is not an isolated symptom. Two years ago, in May 2009, another
man in Chhattisgarh had fallen foul of the State. Himanshu Kumar, a
Gandhian from Meerut had spent 17 years working in Dantewada. He had
an ashram on the outskirts of the forest where tribals from the deep
interiors could come for refuge. Here they learnt how to file FIRs,
petition the district collector, interact with forest officials, seek
redress. But on 16 May 2009, as Indians elsewhere were celebrating a
peaceful General Election — proud symbol of India’s vibrant democracy
— a posse of policemen and several bulldozers rolled into Himanshu’s
ashram and razed it to the ground. He sat with his wife and daughters
under a tree and watched. His elder daughter cried as it rained. When
the police were done, not a trace of the 17 years remained. Just a
drooping crocus and, ironically, pamphlets in Gondi urging tribals to
vote.

For several months more, Himanshu tried to continue his work from a
makeshift ashram nearby. Then, as the intimidations piled up, one
evening he shed his trademark white kurta, shaved his moustache,
disguised himself in red shirt and jeans, scaled the wall of his house
and came away to Delhi. He has never gone back.

Just a few months later, in July 2010, environment activist Amit
Jethwa had just stepped out of the Gujarat High Court when two men on
a motorbike shot him point blank and sped off. Jethwa had been
fighting for two years against illegal mines in the Gir Lion
Sanctuary, owned by a politician, Dinu Solanki. Solanki’s nephew was
later arrested as the prime accused in the murder.

A few months earlier, in February 2010, a young lawyer called Shahid
Azmi was shot dead by gunmen in his chamber in Mumbai. Azmi had been
fighting unpopular cases, mostly defending poor Muslim boys accused of
terrorism. The Crime Branch suspects he was killed on a supari issued
by underworld gangster Bharat Nepali, who deems himself a
“nationalist” and is allegedly close to some sections of the Indian
intelligence establishment.

Shahid was 32 when he was killed; Jethwa was 35. Himanshu is 52.
Binayak is 61. But their stories are linked by a profound thr - ead:
Binayak Sen could have chosen not to be in jail. Kumar could have
chosen not to be in exile. Jethwa could have chosen not to be dead.
Azmi could have chosen to be alive

Secure in the cocoon of our privilege, we imagine we have nothing in
common with the evil repressions of the Middle East regimes and
elsewhere. But the truth is, only a thin membrane separates us from
it: individual choice. If you are among those who chase the rewards of
the market-place and keep your head down, India is a wondrous, silken
place. If you are among those who ask questions, you fall through a
chute.

EARLY THIS year, in a gruesome incident, Yashwant Sonawane, additional
district collector of Malegaon was burnt to death in broad daylight by
local mafia for resisting the pilferage of kerosene. There was
Satyendra Dubey earlier, IIT alumni, killed for protecting India’s
prestigious highway project, the Golden Quadrilateral. There was S
Manjunath, IIM alumnus, killed for sealing pumps adulterating petrol.
And just last year, nine RTI activists were murdered for demanding
little answers.

Cast an eye over other news items strewn across the years and a
landscape of horror opens up. This is the country at the other end of
the chute. Government officials humiliated for doing their duty.
Police officers cut to size for not toeing the line. Activists
maligned and blacklisted. Upright citizens harassed. Over just the
last year, TEHELKA has done several stories detailing such cases.
Whistle and Be Damned, the story of whistleblowers in India. Dead
Right, the story of RTI activists in India. Sanjiv Chaturvedi, forest
official in Haryana, hounded like an animal for doing his job. Kuldeep
Sharma, police officer in Gujarat, hounded for speaking the truth.

All these stories point to a black fact we must confront: there are no
dividends for doing the right thing in India. There is only danger.
India’s public culture, in fact, has designed itself into an ugly
gene: fear, docility, compliance. And a kind of automated blindness.
There is absolutely nothing to pierce this dehumanising membrane
except the random and inexplicable ideas of self that pin some
individuals to a higher ideal.

Binayak Sen did not need to speak up when the atrocities of the Salwa
Judum began in 2005. He had spent 30 years serving the poor in
Chhattisgarh, the State had never been angry with him. He could have
let 600 villages be evacuated. He could have let three lakh tribals be
dispossessed. He could have let corporates swallow the forest whole.
If he had stayed silent, he would not have been accused of sedition.
He had a choice. He chose.

Himanshu Kumar too could have closed his eyes the day the first raped
and maimed tribal girl limped into his ashram. He knew filing hundreds
of cases against the police would rouse the beast. He knew he was
putting his family in jeopardy. But he chose.

What prevented Amit Jethwa from retreating into a comfortable life
like the rest of us and leaving the fate of Gir Sanctuary to the
avarice of politicians and the corruption of forest officials? Shahid
Azmi was 12 when a Hindu mob accosted him; 16, when he crossed over to
Pakistan to train for revenge. Later, disillusioned with militancy, he
spent eight years in rigorous imprisonment in Mumbai, and studied for
his law exam. When he walked free, he could have slipped through the
line into a life of ease. What impelled him to return to the sewer,
fighting for people the system had abandoned, trying to staunch the
hatred and fear around him?

TEHELKA’s cover story this week, The Danger of Being Good, is a
tribute to the precious, quixotic and inspirational idea of the world
and self that drives some Indian citizens to still stand up for a
moral vision. Duty. Justice. Accountability. Honesty. Democracy.
Fairness. Dignity. Empathy. There is nothing in the world around us
that suggests these human values are worth defending. There is nothing
to pin one to their pursuit except the face in the mirror and the
interior dialogue: what sort of human being do I want to be?

If you keep your head down, India is a shining place. Ask questions,
and you fall through a chute

The battles in this cover package range from the quotidian to the
gigantic. There are dozens we have had to leave out. But meditate on
them for a moment, and just this small handful of stories will make
you balk at the depraved society they reveal. Corruption in every
pore: in excise, in income tax, in ports, in highways, in check dams,
in the PDS, in ration cards, in land encroachments, in pollutions of
earth and water and sky. Nothing is safe. Greed is the only propeller.
We are not a society really: we are a termite nest, eating at
ourselves.

As a people then, out of self-preservation if not high ethic, we
should be gearing ourselves to protect those who fight this. But both
as a people and a State, India has set itself on a contrary path.
Every righteous action in this country brings on the wrath of the
“system”: its deadly dance of intimidation and seduction; its crushing
arsenal of transfers, suspensions, false cases, arrests, sudden deaths
and financial squeeze. No one is immune.

This TEHELKA cover then is an alarming reminder that what should have
been the norm has become the exception. Doing one’s duty is no longer
an imperative in India. Nothing governs us as a society now except the
miracle of individual choice. We are secured by the fact that some
people choose to be good, no matter what. But there are myriad dangers
in that. There is not just the might of the State to confront. There
is also the temptation at every turn to just give up, part the skin
and slip over into the silken side where one half of India is living a
charmed life. If you don’t fight the ugliness of the State, it will
behave in benign ways with you. That is one of the hardest lessons
being good in India teaches you.

Some people just choose to be good, no matter what. These are the
stories of what happens to them

.
In palamu, Asking Questions Can kill You
.
The Honest Soldier
.
No Sanctuary for Good Men
.
The Truth That Took Three Lives
.
Lies, Dam Lies
.
Forging Development
.
Vote Hero
.
The Boy Who Would Save Villages
.
The Uniform Code
.
The Lion in Sheep’s Clothing
.
The dead will not Seek power
.
Forest Crusader
.
How to Blow a Whistle and Stay Alive
.
Caught in the Quicksand
.
Seeker Of Truth
.
The Vigilante
.
‘To Work for Humanitarian Reasons is the Will of Allah’
.
The Man Who Would Not Bribe
[email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to