he Non-Nation

*And A Short Story Of Racism*

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in
society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system
that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.”
-Frederic Bastiat (1801-1850), French economist

*‘But are the tribals doing anything with that land?’*

*‘We need the steel, the adivasis need to be compensated for their land
properly. And in my experience, I have seen the companies pay handsomely but
the money is lost in the lower levels of governance.’*

*‘How much money would be enough for your land?’*

*‘The tribals are the ones responsible for destroying the forests.’*

The above statements are some of the most common observations/insights made
by non-tribals about tribals and the ‘largest land grab since Columbus.’ But
before we get to them, I’d like to write about another story of murder in
Dantewada.

On the 23rd of January, 2011, a Special Police Officer Ismael Khan was shot
dead in Dantewada, as he watched a *murgga* fight at the market. It was not
a gunfight, it was a targeted assassination by all accounts. And while it
was nothing new to Kalluri’s Dantewada, there was something that troubled me
about this one particular SPO’s demise. I knew his name, I knew something
else about him.

There is a story untold: the story of Ismael Khan is the story of
Kottacheru, and the story of Kovasi Dhoole, and the story of Dantewada and
the adivasis of Bastar – the danger of a single narrative is the danger of
the constant narrative – of violence,  and counter-violence. Yet the single
narrative needs to be repeated as a vain elegy for every passing statistic
that shall appear at the end of the year by the Home Ministry, about the
Maoists killed, or those the Maoists have killed, or the Security forces
killed in ambushes or assassinated, on the great canvas of the gaping divide
between the rich and the poor, the fat and the dispossessed.

But what is the story of Kovasi Dhule and
Kottacheru<http://moonchasing.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/kottacheru-a-short-history-of-violence/>
?

‘‘Nine of our people were killed in our village,’ Said Maala (name changed),
another IDP from Kottacheru. But when I asked him for the names of the
killed, he only gave me five names – the five people who were killed by the
Salwa Judum. Then another woman, reservedly gave me the name of ‘Kovasi
Dhoole,’ a young woman who was coming home to Kottacheru. And she wasn’t
clear about how she died.

‘Did she die when the Salwa Judum raided the village?’ I had asked.

‘No.’

‘Did the Maoists kill her?’

She was quiet.

Eventually, over the course of six months, after interviewing over 14
villagers of Kottacheru in three different locations in Khammam district,
including Kovasi Dhoole’s sister, I managed to piece together the story of
Kovasi Dhoole and the story of Kottacheru.

In 2007, Kovasi Dhoole was a young woman on her way from Nagaras to her
village of Kottacheru. She was stopped at Errabor police station and
allegedly detained against her will. She only reappeared two months later,
as a SPO, married to another SPO, a ‘*turrka’* or Muslim, according to the
rest of the villagers of Kottacheru. They also alleged that she was forced
to become a SPO, and there was no ‘consent’ in the marriage.

A while later, on the 9th of July, 2007, a combing operation was ambushed
near the village of Gaganpalli by the Maoists. 25 security personnel were
killed via the use of IEDs placed in the trees and small arms fire. The
security personnel retreated out of the jungle and it would take them three
whole days to recover the bodies of their fallen comrades. Kovasi Dhoole was
one of the injured who was abandoned to the Maoists who found her
bullet-ridden body. She was still conscious and breathing. Yet there was no
mercy killing. For some reason, the Maoists took her injured body and left
it at the road, hoping someone would take her to the hospital.

No one did.

Kovasi Dhoole from the village of Kottacheru, bled to death.’

The SPO, or ‘turrka’ who had married her was Ismael Khan. Before Salwa
Judum, he was a *dukaandaar* at Errabor.

Death comes a full circle.

Every story without heroes ends simply with the death of the antagonists.

Yet why do I write about just another story of a dead soldier and a dead
adivasi in Dantewada and what does this have to do with racism?

The story of Ismael Khan, is a manifestation of a cultural hegemony when it
is armed – ‘join us,’ at the point of the gun. That the Salwa Judum is
populated by young men, tribal and non-tribal with a state-as-god-given
right to power is not a myth.

War has now become a way of life for a group of men living together in
society. And they have created for themselves, over the course of the last
few years a legal system that doesn’t need to work, and a media without any
moral code but empty nationalism that glorifies their actions.

And when everyone from the Collector to the *dukaandaar* is an amateur
anthropologist who knows what the tribals need and how they should live, one
needs to wonder when it is openly evident that Operation Green Hunt, in its
many forms, was a long way coming.

And why? Let us go back a bit and put things into context.

The furthest, darkest heart of central India is not where civilization or
development hasn’t completely trickled down, it’s the place where the
post-colonialist face of India is still stark-naked, where the mass delirium
of India’s token democracy has not brainwashed people who’ve been very
conveniently erased from national consensus.

The administration, when it functions, can only acted as an anodyne for a
superstructure that is almost entirely exploitative.

One of the most apologetic analysis of the situation in the jungle is that
the people need ‘development’ or an administration that functions.
Apparently if every village had electricity, a handpump, functioning ration
shops and NREGA schemes devoid of corruption, there’d be no insurgency in
the first place. Yet one thing that is missing in the entire narrative, is
the explicit racism of the majority of the mainstream Indian population when
dealing with the ‘other’ – a fascinating metanarrative of the mainstream
believing that the adivasis don’t see democracy, or their rights, or their
‘development’ as ‘we’ do, just as the West believes about the East.

Firstly, both schemes, NREGA and the PDS, indirectly imply that the people
cannot get work nor feed themselves. Yet why does that situation exist in
the first place?

In the jungles, the state itself has been oppressive for decades. In many
areas, the only face of the state visible to the tribal is the Forest
Department that has routinely exploited, beaten, arrested and robbed the
tribals of their land and forests not just for the last few years but for
decades. The tribals would be happy as ever if such civilization never
reached them. The Forest Department is a part of this same bureaucracy –
IAS, IPS, IFS, all of the same crop of the most brilliant, brightest, minds
or worst nightmares of the indigenous tribals of India – a  ‘collector’, a
word that denotes a collector of taxes, a post-colonial colloquism, but more
importantly, a part of that same super-structure that has kept the adivasis
away from their forests.

Recently, a survey by the Hong Kong-based Political & Economic Risk
Consultancy put India’s bureaucracy as ‘the worst in Asia.’ What a surprise.
But are our bureaucrats really such special beings or are they merely a
manifestation of the culture and society that they are coming from?

This is what one of the members of the Constituent Assembly, Professor
Shibban Lal Saksena had to say about the tribals in 1949, during the
Constituent Assembly Debates,

‘That these brethren of ours are still in such a sub-human state of
existence is something for which we should be ashamed…..I only want that
these scheduled tribes and scheduled areas should be developed so quickly
that they may become indistinguishable from the rest of the Indian
population.’

That apparently, was a much common point of view during the debates of the
Constituent Assembly that was elected to write the Constitution – the tribes
were ‘sub-human’ and they had to be like everyone else. In other terms, that
is called cultural genocide.

Even today the non-tribals will happily go to the Schedule Areas to cheat,
manipulate and exploit tribals. I still remember a non-tribal contractor
happily telling me that ‘you just come to Dantewada to make money in
whatever way possible,’ and in the very next breath, he mentions how,
‘everything this Manish Kunjam is doing is all futile.’ Fighting for tribal
rights, is apparently futile. And when half his party workers are in jail,
and their *hartals* in jail are met with beatings, the state is doing its
best to tell him it is futile.

A prominent journalist working in Dantewada who has often written about fake
encounters and state atrocities had another interesting observation about
industrial development: after spending his entire day with villagers from
Lohandiguda, who spoke about false cases and state repression, who openly
said they had no desire for the 35 or 50 lakhs of rupees for their fertile
lands; he would turn to a foreign correspondent and tell him that this
district needs Tata’s steel plant and development: *so mining is okay if you
don’t shoot the tribals?*

‘What development?’ I had asked surprisingly, ‘how would Tata’s plant
benefit the tribals here?’

‘That it won’t.’ He responded effortlessly.

Let’s not forget that Mr.Chidambaram had once accused a social activist
fighting for tribal rights, for wanting to keep tribals as ‘hunters and
gatherers.’ The intellectual bankruptcy in that statement alone is enough
proof of Mr.Chidambaram’s utmost condescension of over 80 Lakh people of the
country. Adivasis are farmers, Mr.Chidambaram, and if they are hunting and
gathering to survive, it’s because the Forest Department has kicked them out
of the forests and built plantations over the land they cultivated.

But there is more, ‘Yes, we can allow the minerals to remain in the ground
for another 10,000 years, but will that bring development to these people?
We can respect the fact that they worship the Niyamgiri hill, but will that
put shoes on their feet or their children in school?’ – Thus Spake
Chidambaram.

‘Will that solve the fact that they are severely malnutritioned and have no
access to health care?’

*Apparently the massive exploitation and the dispossession of their forests
doesn’t have anything to do with a tribal’s inability to feed his/her
family.* On the 22nd of March this year, over 64 tribals and Dalits from
Bolangir, one of the hungry KBK districts (Koraput-Bolangir-Kalahandi) of
Orissa, were rescued from virtual bonded labour at a brick kiln in
Hyderabad. They had been working without pay for over five months and faced
regular beatings by their contractors.

There are an estimated 600 brick kilns (2005 figures) populated with tribals
and Dalits from Orissa in Andhra Pradesh, and there is an endemic debt-trap,
brought on by advance payments by ‘*sardars’* or middlemen – and the worker
and his family has no choice but to work in the brick kiln until he can pay
off the advance, and often faces abuse in an almost un-regulated industry
thriving in the universe of unequal power.

On the 28th of March, 2011, 44 adivasis and Dalits from Bolangir and Nuapada
had to be rescued from a brick kiln at Pattancheru Mandal after one of
the contractor’s relatives tried to rape a tribal woman.

Apart from that, almost all the workers complained of meagre weekly wages,
threats and beatings. The incident of attempted rape was merely the breaking
point. The muslim husband-wife contractor-duo responded by calling it all
lies, and that the adivasis were all just drunk.

The adivasis wanted go back home. The contractors wanted them to continue
working.

After the perpetrator was taken away by the police, every conversation with
the *mistrys** *and contractors attempting to bring better working
conditions for the people were met with responses like, ‘these people are
all cheaters.’

‘they lie like this all the time.’

‘they don’t understand reason.’

Nearby contractors who also ran a brick kiln sat on the sidelines gave their
wholehearted support to the Muslim contractor and his family. And class, the
great equalizer plays its role.

One Matang couple who live in a village in Nandurbar in Maharastra without
land of their own, and work in Brahmin fields for Rs.50 a day during the
harvest season, had quite easily filled his shoes as a contractor-exploiter
for the adivasis at brick kilns in Andhra Pradesh.

‘They were such nice people,’ *She* said, about the contractor-duo and their
alleged rapist-relative, ‘these Orissa people had to ruin everything.’

Even their own workers caught up with me and told me that they weren’t
treated well by them either. And while they went back to work, the 44 men,
women and children from Bolangir and Nuapada were taken away by the
government’s labour department and put on a train back to home – Bolangir,
where droughts and hunger deaths had put the district in a spotlight, where
all the *recently-rescued *said that they had no land, or if they did, there
was no irrigation facility to help make it productive.

There are no figures on how many adivasis from the KBK districts migrate to
work under adverse conditions at brick kilns in Andhra Pradesh. There are
independent estimates in thousands while they’re almost invisible to the
government.

And funny how the starvation deaths in Kalahandi, were used as arguments by
Vedanta’s lawyers to justify the mining of Niyamgiri.

And yet ‘they’ – the ‘rulers of the country’, want an Adivasi battalion
formed for the Dantewadas and Lalgarhs – like there hasn’t been enough
fratricidal violence in the Red Corridor.

Instead of starving them, let them kill each other while we mine their
mountains.

The state is not just oppressive, but the people have been for decades. The
adivasis are seldom treated as equals by non-tribals and it’s not just
‘development’ or a corruption-free administration that the tribals need to
rescue them (*and themselves*) from insurgencies.

There is more.

Insurgencies are symptomatic of the very idea of a nation-states. The
fantasies of nationalism, these post-colonial hangovers, along with a bunch
of elitist clowns with delusions of grandeur have drawn imaginary lines
across communities where the majority literally drives minorities into the
hole, and there will be identity-driven self-assertions of rights. A
thousand times over, I’ve heard adivasis call themselves Muria, not Maoists,
Kondhs, not Maoists, Muria, not ‘Indians’, Kondh, not ‘Indians.’ The Maoists
from Andhra Pradesh in Dantewada had managed to build a base because they
spoke Muria, they spoke Koya, they let the tribals remain tribals (to an
extent) + (apart from entirely militarizing their society).

Now, has the Indian mainstream ever allowed minorities to be minorities?
Have they allowed the tribals to at least decide their own fate?

Yes, we have. The Indian Constitution has one of the most progressive laws
in the world – PESA or Panchayat (Extension to Schedule Areas) Act, where
the tribals are allowed to govern themselves with their own Gram Sabhas. The
Supreme Court would not have the right to veto a decision of the Gram Sabha
if it said it didn’t want Tata or Jindal or Essar to build on their land.
And yet, these Gram Sabha resolutions have been violated by the
administration repeatedly across the Fifth Schedule, with complete impunity,
often in the favour of big business, as well as the upper caste landlords,
thekedaars and non-tribals.

So now as I brought it up, I must ask, why is our administration routinely
flouting PESA resolutions?

This is what one of the Collectors of Bastar, J.P. Vyas had to say to
Anthropologist Nandini Sundar, in 1992 about a proposed Steel Plant being
set up in Bastar and the displacement it would cause.

‘If the people were consulted beforehand and asked for permission, inherent
in this, is the possibility that they might refuse. And then where would the
government be?’

He had gone on to tell her that the people were ignorant and once the
experts decided where the project would be, there was nothing more to be
said – (from her book on Bastar, *Subalterns and Sovereigns).*

Today, there are state-organized public hearings, where the representatives
of big companies often tell the tribals, ‘there are other things here that
are too technical to understand.’

Another brilliant expert, I had encountered, worked in the ITDA (Integrated
Tribal Development Authority) Badrachalam, who didn’t know who the Murias
were, and he requested that I tell the tribals to leave the jungles and come
and live closer to the road so the government welfare programmes can reach
them.

All of it pretty much summing up that the ‘tribals don’t know any better,’
that they ‘need to do something with their land’, or that land, life and
livelihood can be equated with money.

I wonder where that idea comes from.

What becomes only too evident, is that we have a social apartheid, where we
have an invisible, un-written set of value-judgements upon an entire class
of people who live out of sight and out of mind, and we’re aping the West
who’ve colonized, butchered, enslaved, and murdered indigenous societies for
centuries, and we are too far from evolving into a democracy they have never
been, and could possibly never be – one that is egalitarian, just and equal,
impassioned yet restrained, and where the words ‘development’ would belong
to the people, and not politicians and their wanker-overlords.

To be a nation that is simply accepting of diversity, not just by shallow
pretence but by substance. But we are just another half-democracy,
half-republic and half-nation that needs to cannibalize itself to survive.
http://moonchasing.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/the-non-nation/
-- 
Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist
*
*
*
*
*The UID project i**s going to do almost exactly the same thing which the
predecessors of Hitler did, else how is it that Germany always had the lists
of Jewish names even prior to the arrival of the Nazis? The Nazis got these
lists with the help of IBM which was in the 'census' business that included
racial census that entailed not only count the Jews but also identifying
them. At the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, there is an
exhibit of an IBM Hollerith D-11 card sorting machine that was responsible
for organising the census of 1933 that first identified the Jews.*
*
*
*http://saynotoaadhaar.blogspot.com/*
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_162987527061902&ap=1

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to