To:  Chairperson, NCPCR, India

28 June 2011

To
Dr Shantha Sinha
Chairperson, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights
5th Floor, Chanderlok Building, 36, Janpath,
New Delhi - 110 001

Sub: Request to be heard in connection with complaints against Children
being 'used' in anti-POSCO movement in Jagatsinghpur District, Odisha

Dear Madam,

We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned at the recent developments of
accusing POSCO Pratirodh Sangram Samiti (PPSS), the organization
spearheading a peaceful, democratic movement for more than five years
against forceful land acquisition for the proposed POSCO project in Odisha,
for ‘using’ children as shields in the movement. The department of Women and
Child Development of Government of Odisha has also initiated an
investigation of the matter. We also understand that representations have
been made before you by certain forces in Delhi complaining about the
violations of child rights in the area by the anti-POSCO movement in
Jagatsinghpur district. The news report suggests that you have “…assured
that the Commission would take immediate necessary action against the
culprits…” The news is available at

We believe that the allegations and accusations against PPSS is an attempt
to diffuse the focus of the peoples’ struggle and make a nuisance about an
issue that does not hold any truth. It is true that children have been at
the forefront of the recent protests against the government's attempt to
forcefully take the land of the people of the area for the proposed steel
plant. However, they have joined the protest as part of their families,
whose entire livelihood and existence are threatened by this project. When
both the state and central governments remain deaf to their numerous
appeals, these protests are an inevitable attempt by the people of the area
to halt the illegal seizure of their land for the project. While the
children, women and men in the area are peacefully protesting against the
project, the administration went ahead and declared yesterday (27 June 2011)
that the protest was ‘illegal’ as it’s ‘using’ children and announcing with
the loudspeakers to leave the area or face consequences. Presence of heavy
police force in the area continues to create a threatening situation for
people in the area.

While you may be thinking of initiating an investigation based on the
complaints you have received, we would like to bring to your notice a few
facts that may supplement to your efforts:

1. The upper primary school in Balitutha (one of the entry points to the
proposed project area) has been occupied by the police force since 2007
making it impossible for children in the area to have a normal schooling
experience. For the past four years, children of this school are forced to
sit outside either on the veranda of the school or under a tree or even no
classes on many occasions while the state police continue to occupy the
school. There have been news reports on this as well. The children are not
even allowed to use the toilets as the police have virtually taken them over
leaving children with no option but go out in the open including the girls.

2. Schools in Balia, Kujanga, Gada Kujanga, Andhari, and Bijipur are also
occupied by the police forces for months denying children education in the
process. The policemen – right in the space that children should occupy –
clean their weapons, test-fire for practice, and also engage in drinking
alcohol and merry-making, etc., creating an atmosphere of fear and
intimidation in the community in particular and leaving damaging images of
terror in the tender minds of the children.

3. This situation is prevailing in the area despite the fact that there have
been two court orders viz., Kolkata High Court judgment on Lalgarh and the
Supreme Court order on Dantewada, directing the forces to vacate the
schools.

4. More than one thousand armed police were deployed in the area and threats
were made repeatedly over loudspeaker, including to the hundreds of children
present there, that the protesters would be lathi-charged, tear-gassed, and
beaten if they did not disperse. This continued for days while the women,
children, and men of the area were lying on the hot sand under an intense
sun, embracing their land that they do not want to let go.

5. The acquisition of land and resources from the area will render people
homeless, leading children to have a completely uncertain future. The
resistance to the proposed project and forceful land acquisition has been to
protect their present resource base, culture, identity, and a secured
future. This is the reason why children have joined the resistance and have
been in the forefront in the recent protests. As the Samiti said in a press
statement on June 12th, their children have joined the protest because their
future and their security are at stake, and because their parents do not
wish to see them reduced to lead a precarious existence. Given that the
"compensation" offered by the government is less than a year's income, it is
clear that this project will destroy the livelihoods of these families and
force their children into destitution. The children are directly witness to
constant threats and intimidation by the state and company goons for the
past six years, and they clearly understand by now what would befall them if
their land and their parents’ livelihood options are taken away for the said
project. And, no law restricts the rights of a child to protest when s/he
thinks that injustice is being done to her/him!

6. The agitating people have faced severe repression several times in past
five years and there is constant fear of being arrested looming large in the
minds of people. In fact, many of the parents in the area had been
imprisoned in past five years for resisting the project and in such
situation; children had to fend for themselves.

We do not understand how the rights of children are upheld by the state in
the current situation and how it will be upheld in the wake of their
homelessness. Isn’t the state itself engaging in an act of violating the
rights of children? We want to know why action should be not taken against
the state for forcing the children to stay away from one of their
fundamental rights, i.e., right to education! We do not understand how the
state and those organizations who are trumpeting about violation of
children’s rights for they joined the protests have suddenly become so
concerned about children’s rights. Where were they when the police was
attacking the people including the children in the area in May last year?
Where’re they when company supported goons bombed at people in November 2007
that left several parents severely injured. We wonder where these defenders
of child rights were to be found when the police filed hundreds of omnibus
FIRs against the villagers of the area, imprisoning many villagers for
months on end and depriving the children of parental care. We wonder why
they seem to care nothing for whether these children have any future, or
whether they believe that the forcible arrest, beating, and impoverishment
of their parents is in the interest of the children.

We urge the Commission to look at the act of forceful and illegal
acquisition of land in Jagatsinghpur in Odisha as a violation of rights of
children and hope that the Commission will consider that those approaching
it in this regard do not come with clean hands, and that these facts will be
given due consideration before any action is taken.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned <http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?27062011>
http://www.petitiononline.com/27062011/petition.html
-- 
Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist
*
*
*The UID project i**s going to do almost exactly the same thing which the
predecessors of Hitler did, else how is it that Germany always had the lists

of Jewish names even prior to the arrival of the Nazis? The Nazis got these
lists with the help of IBM which was in the 'census' business that included
racial census that entailed not only count the Jews but also identifying
them. At the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, there is an
exhibit of an IBM Hollerith D-11 card sorting machine that was responsible
for organising the census of 1933 that first identified the Jews.*
*
*
*http://saynotoaadhaar.blogspot.com/*
*http://aadhararticles.blogspot.com/*
*http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_162987527061902&ap=1*<
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_162987527061902&ap=1>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to