http://www.publishaletter.com/readletter.jsp?plid=29245
Dear Editor:
The Eleventh of July was the World Population Day 
The UN Secretary General in his message on this day has stated 
"This year’s World Population Day falls during a milestone year, when we 
anticipate the birth of the earth’s seven billionth inhabitant. This is an 
opportunity to celebrate our common humanity and our diversity. It is also a 
reminder of our shared responsibility to care for each other and our 
planet....Later this year, a seven billionth baby will be born into our world 
of complexity and contradiction. We have enough food for everyone, yet nearly a 
billion go hungry. We have the means to eradicate many diseases, yet they 
continue to spread. We have the gift of a rich natural environment, yet it 
remains subjected to daily assault and exploitation. All people of conscience 
dream of peace, yet too much of the world is in conflict and steeped in 
armaments"
The UN Secretary General has rightly hit upon some important points.  As per 
the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), "World military 
expenditure in 2010 is estimated to have been $1630 billion, an increase of 1.3 
per cent in real terms over 2009. The region with the largest increase in 
military spending was South America, with a 5.8 per cent increase, reaching a 
total of $63.3 billion. ...This continuing increase in South America is 
surprising given the lack of real military threats to most states and the 
existence of more pressing social needs....Part of the explanation for this 
rise is to be found in the strong economic growth the region has experienced in 
recent years, while in other regions the effects of the global economic 
recession caused military spending to fall or at least rise more slowly in 
2010.... Although the rate of increase in US military spending slowed in 
2010—to 2.8 per cent compared to an annual average
 increase of 7.4 per cent between 2001 and 2009, the global increase in 2010 is 
almost entirely down to the United States, which accounted for $19.6 billion of 
the $20.6 billion global increase". 
http://www.sipri.org/media/pressreleases/milex
The question, however, which the UN Secretary General has failed to look at is 
whether greater growth in economy (south America) is going hand in gloves with 
more spending on arms  (and comparatively less on social services) and whether 
less economic growth (US) is also accompanied by greater spending on arms to 
boost economy and usurp oil of resource rich countries due to so called "war on 
terror" and "democratisation".  
The Global Gini index (distribution of family income) which measures the degree 
of inequality in the distribution of family income in a country is 45.0 in the 
case of US,  56.7 in the case of Brazil and 47 in the case of China (latest 
available year, http://www.mongabay.com/reference/stats/rankings/2172.html).  
Rather than set its own house (recession and inequalities) in order, is raiding 
another country used by US as a strategy to boost its economy? Is Brazil 
dealing with economic inequalities and drug mafia (a bi product) through 
greater arms spending? Is China suppressing dissent through greater arms 
spending, as well as investing in becoming a super power? This could be equally 
true of India where officially Gini Index is placed at 36.8   (latest available 
year, http://www.mongabay.com/reference/stats/rankings/2172.html).  
Yet another question, is arms being used to protect MNCs from industrialized 
countries  from appropriating natural resources of other countries, as is 
happening in Thervoy Kandigai village,  Thiruvalluvar district, Tamil Nadu, 
India  wherein police is protecting the France based Michellin Tyre company 
than the people. The company is appropriating grazing land and forests of dalit 
(majority), Backward castes and tribal people when the Gram Sabha (village 
council) and public tribunal had ruled otherwise. In fact the forest acts as 
watershed for not only this village but 24 other villages. Amongst these 
oppressed groups, women bear the brunt of such appropriation more than men.   
http://kafila.org/2011/02/18/anbulla-kaadu-my-beloved-forest-madhumita-dutta/.  
Police and force is also used to support family planning in some countries like 
China, with son preference leading to elimination of daughters 
http://www.lifenews.com/2004/12/14/nat-1042/
IF ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH INEQUALITIES AND ECONOMIC RECESSION ARE DEALT WITH 
THROUGH SPENDING ON ARMS and MNC APPROPRIATION OF COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES IS 
SUPPORTED BY USE OF ARMS ONE NEEDS TO QUESTION THE PARADIGM OF DEVELOPMENT THAT 
IS FOLLOWED BY COUNTRIES, UN AND BRETTON WOODS INSTITUTIONS. HOW CAN FUNDING BE 
RAISED FOR SOCIAL SERVICES?  
ANDRE GUNDER FRANK'S THEORY OF DEVELOPMENT AND UNDER DEVELOPMENT 
(https://www.rienner.com/uploads/4858093a03883.pdf) SHOULD BE ADAPTED AND USED 
TO ANALYSE THE PROBLEM AND PAULO FRIERE'S PEDAGOGY OF OPPRESSED 
(http://www.pedagogyoftheoppressed.com/) SHOULD SHOW PATHWAYS AHEAD.     
IT IS SUGGESTED THAT UN SECURITY COUNCIL IS RULED BY COUNTRIES WHICH SPEND 
LEAST PERCENT OF GDP ON ARMS  AND MOST ON SOCIAL SERVICES, HAVE LEAST GINI 
INDEX AND PREFERABLY KEPT MNCs OUT,  DO NOT APPROPRIATE NATURAL RESOURCES OF 
OTHER COUNTRIES THROUGH THEIR INDUSTRIES and FOLLOW PEDAGOGY OF OPPRESSED.  ARE 
THERE ANY?
ranjaniIndependent Researcher and Activistaffiliated with Dalit Mukti Morcha 
and other social movements 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to