Forwarding an article on  Heron UAV below.

 An account of arms merchants and their profits by
any and every means !!!! It would be an
interesting study the personal life trajectory
of any one of them .

The Bible says what you sow you shall reap .

             Niloufer

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: SUNDARA BABU 
  To: activism-news-network 
  Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:41 PM
  Subject: [ANN:4473] Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) Heron UAV 
todeployagainst adivasis in India





  ---------- Forwarded message ----------



  
http://www.negedneshek.org/2011/07/iai-heron-uav-to-deploy-against-adivasi-in-india/
  Jimmy Johnson: IAI Heron UAV to deploy against adivasis in India
  27/07/2011 
  Israel Aerospace Industries’ (IAI) Heron unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is set 
to add another to its list of targeted victims, adivasi (tribal) militants in 
central and eastern Indian states. The Daily News & Analysis of Mumbai notes 
that the national government will undertake “a first-of-its-kind effort to 
counter Maoists” and will deploy the IAI “Heron’s eagle eyes to track their 
movements on [a] real time basis.” [note: 'the Centre' - found throughout the 
linked article - is a term used in India to refer to the national government 
and 'Naxalite' is a term used to refer to the various communist adivasi groups 
engaged in armed struggle to protect themselves and their lands, formerly from 
the Forest Department, now primarily from mining companies, the police, and 
local paramilitaries.]
  Arundhati Roy’s stellar 2010 essay “Walking With The Comrades” is a vital 
read for understanding the Naxalite struggle and a 2009 essay of hers – “Mr. 
Chidambaram’s War” – also offers tremendous context. For months now, the Indian 
press has been filled with discussions about deploying the nation’s UAV fleet 
against the Naxalites. For reasons of budget, training, local police rejection, 
technological problems (mostly questions about the efficacy of the Heron’s 
capability for surveillance in the dense jungle where the Naxalites are strong) 
and political sensibilities, the decision was not made until now.
  India first ordered the Heron UAV in 2001, then placed further orders in 2003 
and 2005. IAI’s drone sales to India go back to Heron precursors such as the 
Harpy (1995), Searcher (1996), and Searcher II (2000, 2002). The firm has also 
played a major role in developing Indian drone technology and has signed 
several joint-development agreements with Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. and 
Jubilant Bhartia Group.
  To date, UAVs have primarily been deployed along India’s coastline and the 
borders with China and Pakistan by the Army and Navy, and in the disputed 
region of Jammu and Kashmir, especially during the 1999 Kargil War. Now they 
are to be deployed against what Prime Minister Manmohan Singh called “perhaps 
[India's] gravest internal security threat.”
  Roy and the Naxalites themselves portray things differently. Roy points to a 
2008 report [PDF] from a panel of experts commissioned by the Indian government 
itself which states:
  However, the Naxalite movement has to be recognised as a political movement 
with a strong base among the landless and poor peasantry and adivasis. Its 
emergence and growth need to be contextualised in the social conditions and 
experience of people who form a part of it. The huge gap between state policy 
and performance is a feature of these conditions. Though its professed long 
term ideology is capturing state power by force, in its day to day 
manifestation it is to be looked upon as basically a fight for social justice, 
equality, protection and local development.
  The Naxalites then can only be a grave security threat if current Indian 
policy offers no recourse for demands for social justice. If the Indian state 
was amenable to social justice it could simply accede to the just adivasi 
demands, almost instantly removing any threat from militants. Instead, India 
has declared war on its own citizens.
  Roy points out the language often use to describe the targeted areas such as 
‘Maoist infested‘ or ‘Maoist afflicted‘. The use of public health and 
epidemiological terminology points to solutions much more like disease 
eradication than population engagement (this despite the panel of experts 
stating explicitly that “Since the goals of the movement are political it has 
to be addressed politically.”).
  In the best of times, which have not been very good, the Indian state has 
neglected entirely the adivasi communities. When the ‘democratic’ Indian state 
has engaged, common results have been brutal and tragic. The panel of experts 
listed some of the norms:
  Social boycott.
  Denial of employment.
  Consumer segregation (not being allowed to buy certain products, such as 
fish).
  Denial of the right to vote.
  Public insults and humiliation by upper castes.
  Forbidding the carrying out of cultural practices.
  Theft of goods by police and upper caste persons.
  Forced nude marches through public areas.
  It gets worse:
  Violent suppression of political demonstrations.
  Being force-fed excrement (in the case of a carpenter who demanded pay owed 
for work).
  Indentured servitude/debt peonage.
  Arbitrary arrest, torture and detention.
  Arson by police, landlords and upper caste individuals and groups against 
houses and entire villages.
  Amputations of hands, fingers and limbs by upper caste persons.
  Kidnapping and murder by upper caste persons.
  Mass extrajudicial executions (“encounter killings”) by police and 
paramilitaries.
  Systematic rape by police and military.
  The desire to keep this piece manageable demands ending the list there.
  And who are the Naxalites the Heron will be deployed against? Roy describes 
them as such.
  The Maoists’ guerrilla army is made up almost entirely of desperately poor 
tribal people living in conditions of such chronic hunger that it verges on 
famine of the kind we only associate with sub-Saharan Africa. They are people 
who, even after 60 years of India’s so-called Independence, have not had access 
to education, healthcare or legal redress. They are people who have been 
mercilessly exploited for decades, consistently cheated by small businessmen 
and moneylenders, the women raped as a matter of right by police and forest 
department personnel. Their journey back to a semblance of dignity is due in 
large part to the Maoist cadre who have lived and worked and fought by their 
side for decades.
  Their public image is one of a savage group attempting to keep India in the 
Stone Age by perpetrating brutal attacks against agents of progress and 
development. The brutality of Naxalite attacks and ambushes is undeniable. Some 
attacks are impossible to defend, at least to defend sensibly. But as Roy 
points out, “People have the right to resist annihilation.” Annihilation is 
what the adivasis are facing. India’s largest newspaper, Times of India, noted 
in 2009 that the “Naxal cancer” is spreading. The only answer to cancer of 
course, is to cut it out. That is the policy being pursued and that is what the 
Heron will be deployed for.
  To date the Heron is being, has been or will soon be deployed against:
  The Palestinian and Lebanese people, for use against whom it was developed.
  The Iraqi people by Australia.
  The Afghani people by Australia, Canada, France, Germany
  The Kurdish people by Turkey.
  Favela dwellers in Rio in Brazil (though the much more sensible policing 
policies being pursued by elements of the Rio police and national government 
allow for the possibility that it will not lead to human rights abuses).
  Narcotraffickers around El Salvador by El Salvador and the US (while 
narcotraficantes don’t deserve much sympathy, the history of US-led anti-drug 
efforts have invariably included massive injustices).
  To this we can now add the adivasi peoples of Central and Eastern India. 
Developed for use against the Palestinian people, it is a paradigmatic 
technology of Israel’s ‘Pacification Industry.’ It is not a tool to bring 
security, or justice and peace. It will not further the political engagement 
the Indian government recognizes as necessary to address mass injustices faced 
by adivasis. It will not work out the details in negotiations between 
Palestinians and Israelis. It is a tool to manage and extend the inequality of 
the status quo.





  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ACTIVISM NEWS NETWORK" group.
  To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
  For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/activism-news-network?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to