http://www.kashmirtimes.com/news.aspx?ndid=15380&ct=column


The politics of Anna’s fast

PRAFUL BIDWAI

No government in India has bent over backwards to please a civil society
campaign as much as the Manmohan Singh government, in respect of the Jan
Lokpal (Ombudsman) Bill, drafted by a small group of people, including Anna
Hazare, nominated by an NGO called India Against Corruption (IAC). And no
single individual’s act has recently attracted as much popular support as Mr
Hazare’s fast for passing the Bill on terms dictated by him by an impossibly
short deadline.
The result of the drama unfolding over the past fortnight is that India may
have a somewhat stronger Lokpal than intended in the flawed official Bill.
But the Lokpal will also probably have excessive power and inadequate
accountability. A lot will depend on how wisely Parliament’s Standing
Committee on legal matters handles the issue, and whether Team Anna shows
more flexibility than it has done so far.
Equally important, the government’s strong-arm tactics and inept actions
have set a precedent, which strengthens a particular type of civil society
movements, which bypass the normal processes of democracy. They lay claim to
moral authority superior to that of the elected representatives of the
people and have a dangerous potential for vigilantism.
The government wasn’t sincere about the Lokpal and drafted a badly flawed
Bill. But IAC’s Jan Lokpal Bill too is substantively flawed, and its method
coercive and undemocratic. An all-powerful Lokpal is no magic wand against
corruption. The Lokpal would enter the picture only after corruption has
occurred. But to pre-empt, prevent and control corruption, especially where
it affects the poor, other means are needed.
The Bill would virtually create a parallel government, a gigantic apparatus
that subsumes the CBI and the Central Vigilance Commission and usurps all
kinds of police, investigative, prosecution, punitive and quasi-judicial
powers, with a huge budget (one-quarter of one percent of the government’s
revenues). This violates the principle of separation of powers which is
vital to democracy. The Lokpal would also “approve interception and
monitoring of messages of data or voice transmitted through telephones,
internet or any other medium ….” The Lokpal fund would be given 10 percent
of the money confiscated under his/her orders. This is self-serving.
There can be no single-shot solution to the problem of corruption.
Corruption doesn’t occur primarily, as Team Anna holds, because there’s a
“lack of an independent, empowered … anti-corruption institution”. The real
reasons include unequal access to centres of power and seeking rent to
enable such access; a neoliberal policy regime that encourages privatisation
of common property resources through sweetheart deals and a
politician-bureaucrat-businessman nexus; the rise of super-greedy
entrepreneurs; an increasingly compromised civil service; poorly monitored
public service delivery; and a dysfunctional justice delivery system.
Correcting these will need electoral and administrative reform, social audit
of important programmes, good grievance redressal, transparency in
appointments, and new laws on judicial accountability, whistleblower
protection, and rights to public services. Some of these measures have been
suggested by Aruna Roy and the National Campaign for People’s Right to
Information. Team Anna has ignored them.
Mr Hazare has been projected as a messiah and a parallel national power
centre. Team Anna demands that its Bill be instantly passed in its pristine
form without negotiation—on pain of the government being toppled. This
ultimatum subverts the possibility of a real debate on the Bill and imposes
the will of a handful of people on the nation.
Team Anna members openly question even Parliament’s legislative supremacy.
Their argument is, democracy is the rule of the people, and we alone
represent the people. Just look at the crowds in Ramlila Maidan and you’ll
understand, as Kiran Bedi memorably said, that “Anna is India and India is
Anna”!  But majoritarianism isn’t democracy. Majoritarian movements can
easily take a Right-wing authoritarian turn. It’s equally dangerous to pass
off a highly coercive tactic like a fast-unto-death as normal democratic
protest. Mr Hazare gave an undertaking to the police that he wouldn’t fast
unto death. But Team Anna has been shifting the goalposts on this.
The government’s capitulation to the Hazare campaign had little to do with
the Jan Lokpal Bill’s merits, or the genuineness of Dr Singh’s new-found
respect for civil society or democratic dissent. The government capitulated,
as it always does, when faced with a movement with a middle class or elite
character.
The movement has since attracted ordinary people’s support because of
widespread revulsion against corruption, not informed agreement with the Jan
Lokpal Bill. It snowballed after Mr Hazare’s wrongful pre-emptive arrest and
release. Thousands of poor people thronged Ramlila Maidan, and dabbawalas
joined the protests in Mumbai.
Yet it bears recalling that the original campaign, launched in April, was
Facebook- and Twitter-driven. It mobilised upper middle class people in the
big cities through the technology of using free missed calls to have its
supporters stay connected. A telecom company provided the technology, and
somebody paid a pretty penny for the millions of calls answered. (According
to the IAC website, 13 million were answered by August 15.)
The middle class has dictated terms to the government on many issues for
many years: exchanging terrorists for civilian hostages on the IC-814 flight
hijacked to Kandahar in 1999, and getting affirmative action under the
Mandal commission’s recommendations diluted in the 2000s through groups like
Youth for Equality.
The agitation against affirmative action was driven by hatred of the “low”
castes and “chura chamars”. The present campaign is motivated by disdain for
democratic politics and hatred of all politicians. But there’s continuity
between the two movements in personnel and in slogans like “Bharat Mata ki
Jai”. That’s one reason why Dalits, low-caste Hindus, and large numbers of
Muslims are cold towards Anna’s movement or suspicious of it.
The unstated premise is that all politicians are corrupt. In fact, as Mr
Hazare has said time and again, existing democratic politics is itself
corrupt. He says he doesn’t believe in elections because ordinary people
“cast their vote under the influence of Rs 100 or a bottle of liquor ….”
This extremely cynical view of democracy shows utter contempt for the Indian
people who have repeatedly punished corrupt or under-performing politicians.
India’s democracy has numerous flaws. But the voter’s lack of awareness
isn’t one of them.
There is a difference, though. The middle class strata which have planned,
led and formed the core of the latest agitation have a specifically
corporate character. They are all products of post-1991 neoliberal policies
and belong to new service sector businesses in Information Technology,
banking and insurance.
These strata worship their CEOs and have imbibed a culture of subservience
to corporate hierarchy. They have had no exposure whatever to ordinary
people except subordinates like peons and drivers. They are easy prey for
spectacles created by 24-hour television news channels, such as Mr Hazare’s
fasts, which became something akin to the cricket World Cup.
There has also been corporate involvement in and funding of the Lokpal
movement. NGOs run by Team Anna leaders Kiran Bedi and Arvind Kejriwal have
received millions of dollars in corporate and Ford Foundation donations.
This past January, 14 industrialists including Keshub Mahindra (he, of
Bhopal fame, as Union Carbide India’s chairman), Jamshyd Godrej and Deepak
Parekh, wrote a letter to Prime Minister Singh complaining of a “widespread
governance deficit”, and pressing for an independent anti-corruption
ombudsman.
Since then, even industrialist SP Hinduja (God bless his pure soul!) has
held forth on corruption and the need for a Lokpal. Strongly pro-corporate
media groups have led the Jan Lokpal TV campaign.
It’s as if a large chunk of businessmen had decided to ditch the
Congress-led UPA government because it’s not delivering “second generation”
neoliberal policies such as reckless privatisation and dismantlement of such
paltry labour protection as it exists. Many industrialists are perhaps
suspicious of Congress president Sonia Gandhi’s mildly Left-of-centre
political bent and her inaccessibility. Logically, this means they would opt
for the Bharatiya Janata Party.
This fits in with the involvement of Hindutva forces in the Hazare campaign,
frankly admitted by Ms Sushma Swaraj in Parliament on August 17, confirmed
by Mr Nitin Gadkari’s letter supporting Mr Hazare, and reinforced by RSS
pracharak-ideologue K N Govindacharya’s August 26 statement confirming deep
RSS involvement.
The RSS has long tried to tap into popular sentiment against corruption.
Three years ago, it roped in Mr Hazare and Baba Ramdev. It got Ramdev to set
up the communal Bharat Swabhiman Trust.
Ramdev’s network logistically sustained IAC before and through Mr Hazare’s
Jantar Mantar fast in April. No wonder Ramdev turned up there to claim
ownership, with RSS spokesperson Ram Madhav in tow. However, Ramdev’s own
fast following Anna’s, proved an embarrassment and the RSS zeroed in
exclusively on Mr Hazare, according to BJP and Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi
Parishad leaders who spoke to journalists off the record.
A movement of which Mr Hazare is the figurehead, but which is controlled
externally and clandestinely, has the potential to destabilise the
government from the Right. This does not bode well for Indian’s democracy.
email: [email protected]



--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

<<attachment: Irfan Engineer Engineer.vcf>>

Reply via email to