*
*

   *Dear All*

   *We invite you a public talk on the Land acquisition and Rehabilitation
   Bill  and  Land Titling Bill 2011, by Independent legal researcher from
   Delhi Usha Ramanathan,  on September 3rd, Saturday.*

   *Venue-  Shramik Hall, ** Royal Crest, Lokmanya Tilak Vasahat Road, DADAR
   EAST*

   *Time- 6.00pm*

   * Usha will also share her views and concerns on lokpal bill and the UID/
   aadhar.*

   *The Draft Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Bill 2011, has *been
   drafted as if it is intended to mediate the transfer of land from one set of
   persons to another set of persons.The Land Acquisition Act 1894 (LAA) has
   become as contentious as it has because, over time, the eminent domain power
   of the state as reflected in the LAA has been translated to mean a coercive
   power with the state to effect the transfer of land. This draft Bill, again,
   treats land acquisition as a rule, and doesn’t recognise coercive
   acquisition as an exception. It completely misses the point that conflicts
   all over the country have erupted because the government has been treating
   the LAA as a means of taking over land and handing it over as it pleases it
   to do. Continuing to treat land as a commodity which this helps transact
   will be missing the point about why conflicts abound, which conflicts the
   draft Bill is expected to abate.

   *The Draft Land Titling Bill 2011 *is connected law. That Bill is an
   attempt at commoditisation of land, and makes it visible and definitive as a
   commodity to be traded in the market. The long title says that the law is to
   create a `conclusive property titling system’. It is to `prepare a record of
   all immovable properties’. It shifts the onus from the state to the
   individual to keep the records updated on pain of punishment, and even loss
   of acknowledgment of title to the land or interest in the land. In clause
   36(3), for instance, ` all persons are deemed to have notice of every entry
   in the Register of Titles’. And, in clause 41, `any title recorded in the
   Register of Titles in accordance with the provisions of the Act, shall be
   considered as evidence of the marketable title of the landholder’. This is
   to prepare a record of all immovable properties on the basis of which land
   will be dealt with in the market.


   The idea of introducing an `indemnification’ clause, where the government
   indemnifies a person who acts on the basis of the title as it is recorded in
   the Land Registry is a case of the government taking over the role of an
   insurance company. That is what insurance companies used to do, and still
   do: they indemnify land titles and bear the cost of litigation and ancillary
   matters if they were to arise.


   The Draft Land Titling Bill is not about updating land records. It is not
   about the accuracy of land records, but about its finality for purposes of
   determining encumbrances and saleability. It is about deciding on a means by
   which land may be easily dealt with in the market.


PL SHARE WIDELY WITH YOUR FRIENDS/ NETWORKS IN MUMBAI

 For more information pl contact comrade Vasu-  9821536676/ Vivek-9821062801

-- 
Adv Kamayani Bali Mahabal
+919820749204
skype-lawyercumactivist
*
*
*The UID project i**s going to do almost exactly the same thing which the
predecessors of Hitler did, else how is it that Germany always had the lists

of Jewish names even prior to the arrival of the Nazis? The Nazis got these
lists with the help of IBM which was in the 'census' business that included
racial census that entailed not only count the Jews but also identifying
them. At the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC, there is an
exhibit of an IBM Hollerith D-11 card sorting machine that was responsible
for organising the census of 1933 that first identified the Jews.*
*
*
*http://saynotoaadhaar.blogspot.com/*
*http://aadhararticles.blogspot.com/*
*http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_162987527061902&ap=1*<
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_162987527061902&ap=1>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to