The BSP lost the election in view of the arbitrary arrests by the
ATS and Special Task Force and continued detention of hundreds of
innocent youth on false charges . As economic conditions deteriorate all
over the country , those analysing the nature of the development process
and the consequent economic , political and social injustices will be
increasingly targeted as Maoist or Terrorist or Jehadi . Dr. Binayak Sen
's case reflected this corporate strategy . It is important to maintain
continuous vigilance on the arbitrary arrests , with each case followed
every day and widely publicised in the region and nationally by
organizations committed to the Rule of Law .
 Niloufer Bhagwat

On
11-06-2012, Ranjana wrote: 

> --- On SUN, 10/6/12, PUDR __wrote:
> 
>>>
From: PUDR 
>>> Subject: [pudr-info] Seema Azad Verdict: Another Attempt
to Silence the Critical Democratic Voice
>>> To: [email protected]
>>>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
>>> Date: Sunday, 10 June, 2012,
18:10
> 
>> PEOPLE'S UNION FOR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS 
>> 
>> PRESS STATEMENT

>> 
>> 10th June 2012 
>> 
>> SEEMA AZAD VERDICT: ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO
SILENCE THE CRITICAL DEMOCRATIC VOICE 
>> 
>> PUDR strongly condemns the
verdict of a lower Court in Allahabad awarding life sentence to Civil
Rights activist Seema Azad and her spouse Vishvvijay on charges of
sedition, waging war and under several provisions of the draconian law,
Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). Additional District Judge
Sunil Kumar Singh, while pronouncing the order, also slapped a fine of
approximately Rs 70,000 on the couple. The couple were arrested from
Lukerganj locality in Allahabad on February 6, 2010 by the Special Task
Force (STF) of Uttar Pradesh, which claimed that Maoist literature was
recovered from their possession and that they were associated with a
banned organization, the Communist Party of India (Maoist). Their
arrests were made by the Special Task Force, but the case was later
handed over to the Anti-Terrorism Squad of UP making it a case involving
terrorist activity. 
>> 
>> Seema Azad's incarceration and sentence is a
clear case of silencing dissident voices. Her arrest followed Seema's
active chronicle of people's movement. She was actively associated with
women's liberation front till 2001 and with the revolutionary students'
movement till 2004. Seema is also an active member of PUCL, Uttar
Pradesh. Furthering her concern towards violation of people's rights she
brought out a new magazine, Dastak, which carried out a thorough
investigation of the Ganga Expressway plan which threatened to displace
thousands of farmers. She published the findings of her survey in form
of a booklet and distributed copies. Dastak also published a long report
on the arbitrary arrests and torture of Muslim youth in Azamgarh.
Seema's arrest came in the wake of the growing efforts to sensitize
people of violation of their rights and other concerns relating to human
rights. Seema and Vishvvijay's arrests were a move to crush such efforts
on the pretext of containing efforts of incitement against the
government. Following the detention, bail petitions were presented in
court many a times. Each time the petition was rejected for Seema's
'dangerousness' to the status quo constructing a civil rights activist
into a naxal. Seema's conviction is one of the many cases where
proscription under UAPA shows its true colours. By banning an
organisation as "terrorist" and thereby banning even its literature, it
becomes possible for authorities to target anyone by accusing that
person of having links with a banned organisation. Thus legitimate
activities become unlawful and therefore offensive. 
>> 
>> PUDR
staunchly denounces the judgement as being representative of the efforts
of the government to squash critical voices and extends support to the
cause taken up by activists such as Seema Azad. 
>> 
>> Paramjeet Singh

>> 
>> Preeti Chauhan 
>> 
>> (Secretaries)
> 
> -- 
> You received
this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"humanrights movement" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group,
send email to [email protected].
> For
more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to