*Investigating Acts of Terror: Adopting Unbiased Approach*


*Ram Puniyani*



Hidden in the back pages of some major dailies, there was news that the
third Samjhauta bomber was held in MP (16, Dec 2012). National
Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested Rajender Choudhary, near Ujjain in MP.
He has been named as one of the bombers in the supplementary charge sheet
submitted by the agency. One recalls that in the blast in Samjhauta
Express, way back in 2007, resulted in the death of 68 persons, including
43 Pakistanis. The investigation showed that there were four brief-case
bomb planters, who allegedly acted on the instructions from RSS pracharak
Sunil Joshi, Sandeep Dange and Ramchandra Kalsangra. Of these Sunil Joshi
was later murdered. Many others’ from this camp, who are cooling their
heels behind the bars in jails, are Swami Aseemanand and company. This
series of blasts like Mecca Masjid, Malegaon, Ajmer etc. were planned at
times when religious conglomeration of Muslims at major festivals was
there, so that the casualty is large.



The first striking point of this news is the under projection of the
arrest. If we remember in earlier phase, when for the same incidents of
blasts the innocent Muslim youth were arrested, there were banner headlines
in all the news papers and anchors of TV channels were screaming to the
highest pitch. In this projection the language press added all the
necessary spices to highlight the religion of the arrested culprits. This
was followed by the under reporting of the judgments, which found these
Muslim youth innocent and then these youth were let off. Such news was
again hidden in the back pages as small news items if at all. The pattern
of media reporting showed a clear-cut bias in the nature of reporting.
 Unfortunately
the media pundits have also ignored this major phenomenon of the pattern of
reporting in case of communal violence and terrorist violence. In case of
communal violence the large section of media accepted the version from
police or dominant prevalent versions in an uncritical manner. In case of
terrorist violence the media reported events with the underlying theme as
if all terrorists are Muslims.



The attitude of police also was on these patterns in both communal and
terrorist types of violence. In terrorist violence the arrest of Muslim
youth was done with striking regularity, till the motorcycle of Sadhvi
Pragya Singh Thakur, an ex ABVP worker, was discovered by Hemant Karkare.
Till that time the earlier chiefs of ATS in Maharashtra and other states
where blasts took place, were playing it cool. In most these cases the
involvement of those associated with RSS ideology was not given a serious
thought. When in April 2006 the blast took place in Nanded in the house of
RSS activist Rajkondavar. In front of the house there was a board of
Bajrang Dal and the saffron flag was fluttering. There was enough evidence
to take the investigation further, which might have led to arrest way back
of those who are currently in jails. Since large section of police
preferred to be guided by biases rather than professionalism, the
investigation remained half way and the series of blasts kept taking place.
To arrest the Hindus for acts of terror was an ‘unthinkable thought’ for
most investigating officers. To highlight this in media was not might not
have been thought appropriate by the media. The police and media, both,
focused on the ‘thinkable thought’ and projected Muslims as the culprits.
This thinkable thought was product of the US propaganda duly taken up by
the National media. As per this ‘All Muslims are not terrorists but all
terrorists are Muslims’.



When Hemant Karkare decided to go ahead in a professional way, the path was
not easy for him. He soon faced the political pressure from some sections.
Bal Thackeray in his paper Saamna wrote, that we ‘spit on the face of
Hemant Karkare, while Narendra Modi said that Hemant Karkare is Deshdrohi
(Anti National). The death of Hemant Karkare was a big setback to the
investigation of blast cases. But the path was paved for thinking on these
lines which were unthinkable earlier. With confession of Swami Aseemanand
in presence of a magistrate, which he later retracted, the evidence cam
forth clearly on which Rajasthan ATS and now NIA and other police agencies
may be working meticulously to bring out the truth of these blasts.



While the arrest of Muslim youth was going on recklessly, some social
activists tried, in vain, to draw the attention of the state and
investigating agencies, about the arrest of innocents. That the real
culprits are being overlooked was the underlying statement. These social
activists were ignored  till the people’s tribunal “Scapegoats and Holy
Cows’ held in Hyderabad (August 2008) brought forward the truth for public
and states’ attention to the tragic reality of blasts and the reality about
the culprits who were getting away and the innocents were being arrested.
Needless to say that due to such arrests, the social life and careers of
those innocents who were arrested was ruined. Even now lot of questions
persist; about Batla encounter and the alleged role of Azamgarh youth in
the acts of terror. Some political leaders have been raising the issue but
state so far has been very apathetic to the plight of Muslim youths and
their families who have been implicated in this incident. Now some hope is
being rekindled that these innocents may get justice as on one hand the
professional attitude of NIA is nabbing the real culprits and hopefully
will ensure that the guilty are punished by the court of law.



At the same time, though painfully late, the delegation led by Ram Vilas
Paswan met the Prime Minister and submitted the memorandum on the issue.
The Prime minister has promised that “The government will soon constitute a
mechanism to stop arresting innocent youth, providing justice to them and
their rehabilitation.” Dr. Singh also assured that he will talk to the Home
Minister in this regard. One does not know how the state is planning to
compensate the innocent youth, who have suffered immensely at the hands of
the insensitive state machinery. Will Government gather courage to
institute an inquiry into Batla encounter and bring forth the truth?



One presumes after the Nanded blast (April 2006), which was an accident in
which the Bajrang Dal activists making the bombs were killed, had the
investigation been taken to its logical conclusion many a blasts might have
been prevented and many an innocent lives saved. That’s a conjecture, which
sounds to be a strong possibility in the hindsight. Will this be a lesson
to our concerned authorities to learn from and a pointer to adopt a more
professional attitude in future?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.

Reply via email to