*Whither Annihilation of Caste?*


*Ram Puniyani*



When on this (14th April 2013) anniversary of Dr. Bhimrao Babasaheb
Ambedkar, we pay tribute to his yeomen services towards the cause of social
justice and bringing to fore the values of democracy; we also need to think
as to how his dream and vision of annihilation of caste can be taken
further. Where do we stand in this direction six decades after the
Independence and after the formal implementation of Constitution of India,
which gives us the values of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity?



Caste has been the major marker of Indian, particularly Hindu, society.
While world over the serfs were under the bondage of feudal lords, we had
religiously ordained system of Varna-Jati (Caste). Many theories of caste
prevail, the racial theory, superior Aryans versus the natives, now stands
debunked. The hypothesis of Morton Klass argues that it was a way of
adjusting of tribal to the system of production, which generated surplus.
This understanding indicates towards the understanding that caste evolved
with the particular system of production in India. Kosambi looks at origin
of caste as being due to the continuous process of fusing of tribal into
general society. The major contribution to the understanding of genesis of
caste comes from Ambedkar as per whom caste-varna came into being due to
ideological-religious factors. According to him caste system came into
being as the result of ideologies of Dharmshatras, which was part of
Brahmanism.



In Indian society the interesting point is that caste is prevalent not only
amongst Hindus, it also prevails in other religious communities. The
difference being that amongst Hindus, the caste is prescribed in the holy
books, while in other religious communities; it is a social phenomenon,
like Ashraf, Ajlaf and Arzal amongst Muslims and different denominations
amongst Christians and Sikhs. The first challenge to caste system came from
Lord Gautam Buddha, who talked of Samta, equality. This concept of Samta,
equality became very popular and was accepted by large number of people
till Buddhism was attacked and wiped out from India in eighth century by
those who wanted to restore the varna-caste. During medieval period the
Bhakti saints in particular talked against and questioned the system of
graded inequality, but their voice though a powerful articulation of the
plight of the low caste, remained just an expression of pain and sorrow of
the poor, and was strongly opposed by Brahmin clergy.



The rule of Muslim Kings and British did not change the social structure of
the subcontinent, though during British rule due to the industrialization
and introduction of modern education, the caste system started being
questioned, opposed and socially challenged. The edifice of caste started
loosening up. During the rule of Muslim kings the social structure remained
intact. With the British rule the half way process of industrialization and
modern education came in. At the same time the caste-varna also continued
on the side, though its legitimacy started being questioned in a more
serious way. In the changed situation starting form Jotirao Phule the
movements for caste abolition found grounding in society, though they were
not able to uproot the phenomenon of caste in the full measures as the
feudal production system ran side by side with the process of
modernization. The process of secularization, abolition of the hold of
landlord and clergy, remained incomplete and so the process of caste
transformation remained half way through.



All the struggles started by Ambedkar aimed for social justice, social
equality and democratic values. He led the movements like Chavdar Talab,
for right to have access to public drinking water, Kalaram Mandir, right to
enter temples and also the burning of Manusmriti, as symbolic of the
rejection of religiously ordained caste hierarchy. The resistance to these
led to his conclusion that he had to leave the Hindu fold, which is
dominated by Brahmanical values of Varna. The social political base to his
movements was provided by the national movement, which was aspiring for
throwing away the British colonial power and also struggling for democratic
values. Here Ambedkar rook off from this movement, but the national
movement was not adequate to give him total social justice as this movement
also had upper castes in good measure. So here we see the dilemma of
Mahatma Gandhi versus Ambedkar. Gandhi was not able to go beyond the limits
posed by the participation of all castes in freedom movement. He kept
talking of varna system in a more refined form while taking up cudgels
against untouchability.



Gandhi also opposed the separate electorate, provided by communal award of
MacDonald in 1932. The Poona pact between Gandhi and Ambedkar led to the
reserved Constituency and the provisions of reservations for Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Ambedkar’s vision was that reservations and
inter-caste marriages will be steps towards annihilation of caste. Today
both these face serious obstacles on social ground. The rigidity of caste
is increasing and inter-caste marriage is facing serious obstacles from
conservative forces. While freedom movement led by Gandhi was half way
conceding to the needs of dalits, the other ideology, the one of religious
nationalism was waiting in the wings with the concept of Hindu Rashtra,
Hindu nation. Ambedkar did realize that acceptance of religious
nationalism, formation of Pakistan on that ground will be a disaster for
dalits as it will pave the way for Hindu Rashtra, the slavery of dalits.
Today while most of the commentators are attacking Gandhi, they need to
focus more attention to the impact of the politics and ideology of Hindu
religious nationalism, which is a major obstacle to caste abolition today.



The reservations for dalits led to newer caste equations. On one hand the
section of rising middle class stood to oppose these reservations, tooth
and nail. The anti reservation violence has been witnessed in the Gujarat
in particular in 1980s. Also since the overall development process is not
accommodative of all, the inner competition for reservation has led to a
strange situation where different communities are vying for status as a
particular reserved category. The overall future for the youth is dismal
and it gets reflected in the form of movements for particular castes
getting recognized in this or that category. The other major obstacle to
caste transformation is the politics of Hindutva. On one hand it talks of
Samajik Samrasta (social Harmony), that all castes should have harmony
amongst them. The Hindutva’s concept of ‘Integral Humanism’ emphasizes on
different castes continuing their professions for smooth social
functioning. The social engineering by religious political forces is
co-opting the low caste through various mechanisms, to the extent of using
them as foot soldiers of their anti minority violence. A section of dalits
also is influenced by the process of Sanskritization, aping at upper caste
and imitating them for their future trajectory. As a logical corollary; the
cultural mechanisms, the TV serials, the preaching’s of hoards of God men
are promoting the values of Manusmiriti in a more sophisticated form.



At the same time a serious layer of progressive and dalit intellectuals are
trying to restore the core values and principles of struggles against
caste-varna. The situation today is very complex and caste as a social
phenomenon is far from extinct. Today’s political scenario is a conflict
between the values of democracy on one hand, and the values of religious
nationalism; the politics representing the defense of caste and gender
hierarchy; on the other. The process of social equality; caste annihilation
and values of democracy need to be brought in through a fresh series of
multilayered struggles for a truly democratic society. That alone will be a
tribute to the life and work of the legend of this great visionary, Bhimrao
Babsaheb Ambedkar.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to