*Will the biases about terrorists remain permanent?*


*Ram Puniyani*



We have witnessed number of acts of terror in India, during last two
decades. While those involved in the acts of terror have been coming from
individuals of different religions, the net outcome of the actions of
investigation agencies and police has been to arrest Muslim youth, to put
charges against them and in most cases to release them after the charges
are not proved on any ground. This pattern had a ‘mini-break’ for sometime
after the Malegaon blast of 2008. The professional, unbiased and meticulous
investigation of the Malegaon blast by the then chief of Maharashtra ATS,
Hemant Karkare came as a big step in getting to the terrorists. Due to
this; starting from Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, Swami Dayanand Pandey,
Swami Aseemanand and many others belonging to the ideology of Hindutva
nationalism are currently cooling their heels in the jails. Investigations
into Malegaon and many other blasts are showing the imprint of these
Hindutva groups and people. One thought that this major breakthrough into
acts of investigation will change the mind set of police authorities and
they will overcome their biases and do a more professional job in
investigation into the acts of terror.



Alas that was not to be and guided by Pavlovian reflex, in a knee jerk
fashion, police continues to repeat its pattern of giving statements
immediately after the acts of terror in which the organizations like Indian
Mujahedeen. Lashkar and others continue to be being named without a
thorough probe. This is followed by the usual arrests and framing them.
Recently first in the case of Hyderabad twin blasts on 21 February 2013 in
which 17 people died and over hindered were injured. These bombs were kept
on a bicycle and Indian Mujahideen were blamed for this dastardly act.
Later in Bangalore on 17th April a bomb exploded 300 meters from the BJP
office. For this blast a motorcycle was used. In this blast around 16
people were injured. It was propagated that the blast took place near BJP
office! As usual Indian Mujahedeen were blamed. In this blast again there
was an additional factor about propaganda that blast took place near BJP
office, when in reality the blast was 300 meters away from the spot.
Congress spokesperson Shakil Ahmad said that this blast and the propaganda
of its being near BJP office will benefit BJP in the forthcoming elections,
while another Congress spokesperson and BJP countered the statement of
Shakil Ahmad.



In Bangalore blast, the preceding incidents are very disturbing and
revealing. Just ten days before the Bangalore blast, on sixth April in
Kannur (Kerala) a blast took place from the motorcycle and RSS swayamsevak
A. V. Dileep Kumar who was carrying four kilograms of explosives died. One
recalls that the RSS associates also got killed in blasts in Nanded, Kanpur
and many other places. This Kannur incident was underplayed and not much is
known about the investigation so far as such. It is interesting that police
authorities who immediately named Indian Mujahidin have been totally silent
on the Hindutva connection of probable terrorists, as by now the nation
knows the involvement of Hindutva groups in many acts of terror. The real
loser of these biases held by authorities and common people is the country
as a whole. The real reason being that if we don’t nab the real culprits
and remain trapped in the usual prejudices and biases, the real culprits
will continue to carry on their nefarious work over and over again.



As such apart from other things on this trend of Muslim youth being
arrested a good amount of documentation and people’s investigation has been
done by various human rights groups. ANHAD held a people’s tribunal and
published it report, ‘Scapegoats and Holy Cows’. Lately a significant
report by Jamia Teachers Solidarity Association led by Manisha Sethi has
published 'Framed, Damned, and Acquitted’. This report in a analytic way
tells us the stereotypical manner of police investigation and actions and
the plight of those who were arrested particularly by the Delhi Police
Special Cell on charges of these youth being part of terrorist outfits. In
most of these cases they were acquitted by courts. This report as such
should have created awareness about the police methods and a pressure on
police to mend its ways. The report also points that the biased atmosphere
has been created as media is publishing the police version uncritically.
This is in contrast to the journalistic ethics where the official versions
have to be checked, cross checked and examined critically before publishing
them. The human rights groups also have been struggling for getting
compensation to these victims in good measure but to no avail so far. And
then the question comes up as to what about the police officers who are
guilty of these acts of wrongful investigation and implicating innocent
youth, ruining their life in a serious way? Should they not be punished?

The pattern of police reporting is also very stereotypical and needs to be
seriously criticized. The question is what the senior leadership is doing
in the face of findings of these reports. Is it not important for the
policy makers to take cognizance of such important reports and respond to
them in the form of policy change for the investigation authorities? Amongst
others another human rights group, Rihai Manch from Uttar Pradesh is also
campaigning on this issue and trying to get the innocent youth released. UP
Government had appointed a Nimesh Commission to investigate these cases,
but for reasons known to itself the government is not releasing the report
and is doing some patch work here and there.

While UP Government is dodging over the issue of implicating the Muslim
youth, one of its ministers is having the taste of these biases in United
States, where he was detained at Boston. While he is blaming Indian
External Affairs Minister for this, he is forgetting that these biases
against Muslims are equally widespread and before him, people of the
stature of ex President Abdul Kalam and the celebrity like Shah Rukh Khan
have faced similar situations. Is it not an indication enough for the UP
minister to set his own house in order as for as the implication of Muslim
youth in acts of terror are concerned. The real worrying point of all these
incidents is the way biases against Muslims are becoming rooted more and
more. What efforts are needed to counter this stereotypical nature of
understanding security agencies and perceptions at popular level needs a
serious course correction on urgent basis.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movement@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to