*Debating Elections, Debating Development*

*Ram Puniyani*



The ongoing elections have created turmoil and churning in the society at
an unprecedented level. Media, social sites and whatever platforms are
there, are full of the intense debate about the so called ‘Gujarat Model’
the failures of the UPA II and related issues. While there may be few who
are sitting on the fence, a large numbers has made up their mind one way or
the other. To ensure that most people vote Election Commission wrote to all
the educational heads to appeal to their students to vote.

In tune with this and also to generate debate around these issues, Fr.
Frazer Mascaranhas, Principal of Mumbai’s well known St Xavier’s College,
wrote to his students through his official college email, and his letter
was also put up on the website of the college. The letter took a subtly
nuanced and balanced approach to forthcoming elections and raised doubts
about the claims of ‘Gujarat Model’ of development. It criticized the
Gujarat growth model for being conducive merely for big businesses and
pointed out the slide in the Human Development Index and the poor quality
of health and education in Gujarat. This emphasized that where quality of
life is concerned, the state has not done well. While initially most of the
society through barrage of propaganda started believing in this propaganda,
by now most the statistics from Planning Commission and Nationals Sample
survey show that this was a mere inflated propaganda for electoral gains
and did not reflect the reality of Gujarat.

At the same time the email brought to the notice of students the positive
phenomenon which has taken place in the society during last ten years, the
schemes and policies of great social significance, which have been
undermined and not propagated properly. The email then praises the Rojgar
Yojana and the Food Security Act as they enhance the wellbeing of citizens.
It also commends the Right to Information act. It concluded ‘"The prospect
of an alliance of corporate capital and communal forces coming to power
constitutes a real threat to the future of our secular democracy. Support
people who pledge to work to take Human Development Indicators higher and
who commit themselves to a pluralistic culture in diverse India." The high
point of the mail was “No magic wand or divine miracles will come to the
aid of the Indian people. Their reasoned choice of individuals and
political parties, who promise to work for a real quality of life for all,
will see India prosper or flounder on the precipice. Choose well!”

It can be said that the chief of the institution was not only exhorting the
students to vote but also laying bare the issues which are the core one’s
in these elections. It is true that Mascaranhas as a good educator outlined
the central concerns of the society, the type of development and the needs
of the society.

The whole hell broke loose. Many students of the college said that they are
not going to be swayed by any opinion, will weigh it on their own and use
their own judgment in voting. Some of them also pointed out that their
institution has taught them the culture of healthy debate and this mail
from their principal is a part of that. But the BJP presented it as a
opinion against them, against their Prime Ministerial candidate and
complained to the Election Commission, unmindful of the fact that EC cannot
advise those who are not in the electoral battle. Still the pressure
mounted on the Principal was immense. He was attacked by saying that such a
thing should not have gone from Institute’s mail, he could have written
from his personal email. They accused that it is like using the official
position in expressing one’s political positions. While some faculty upheld
what their principal had done, there were few critical voices also. Amongst
the academic community also some teachers/principals voiced their
opposition to this. The pressure on the principal was so immense that his
letter had to be taken off the Institute’s web site.

What is the ethical and moral position in such matters? We have seen all
the television channels broadcasting the Sri Ram Memorial Oration at Sri
Ram College of Commerce (DU) by Modi live last year. Also one recalls many
newspapers had carried full-page ads of the SRM University’s convocation
ceremony where Modi was the chief guest. At the same time one has not heard
any criticism of the plans by Modi’s to take chopper tours of BHU and Kashi
Vidyapeeth. There have been many well publicized endorsements of Modi by
prominent personalities. Many a Babas and Matas have been endorsing Modi in
public. This group is heading many and educational institutions. Baba
Ramdev has Patanjali University and Gurukul in Rewari. Sri Sri
Ravishanker’s Vidya Mandir trust runs 44 Vidya Mandirs 39 Bal Mandirs,
Institute of Management Studies amongst other. Mata Amritanand Mayi has the
National network of Amrita Vidyalayam. Surely many wrongs don’t make a
right. As such what should be the norm is very important. While Fr. Frazer
has not endorsed any political party, he has merely raised the issues,
though one can see that the logic of his argument does go against one
party.

In our democracy can we bypass such debates in the academic institutions?
While teaching about Nationalism, will we not have to compare and contrast
between Democratic Secular Nationalism and religious nationalism, Indian
Nationalism versus Hindu nationalism? While talking about issues will we
not have to talk about underlying complexities? We do need to nurture our
institutions around healthy debate sans the heat and partisanship. We need
to go beyond the propaganda and encourage our students to unravel the truth
under the heap of propaganda.

There is another interesting aspect of this email. Mascarenhas, being a
religious priest is saying that ‘No magic wand or divine miracles will come
to the aid of the Indian people’, this at a time when Narendra Modi is
claiming that God has chosen him to lead the country. Modi is in line with
some of the recent happenings in the world when God was invoked, George
Bush invoked God in invasion of Afghanistan and Tony Blair did the same in
the context of attacking Iraq!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to