*Did RSS Participate in Freedom Movement?*


*Ram Puniyani*



Freedom movement was an all inclusive movement with the participation of
people of all religions and regions. Its underlying premise was pluralism
and the concept of Secular Democratic India, which bound all the people in
the bonds of fraternity. Those who were for Muslim and Hindu nationalism
kept aloof from this movement for ideological and political reasons.



Since last few decades the Hindu nationalists have been claiming that they
also participated in the freedom movement and that it’s only the
Congress-left historians who are trying to paint them in a negative picture
vis a vis the struggle for independence. Rakesh Sinha presents the fantasies
<http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/this-day-75-years-ago-contrary-to-dogma-rss-did-take-part-in-the-freedom-movement-including-quit-india-movement/>
of RSS participation in freedom movement. His major sources for this claim
are from the British intelligence reports. His claims that RSS took part in
Civil Disobedience movement of 1930 and that the movement got invigorated
due to Hedgewars’ participation in the same are a pure figment of
imagination. It is true that Mr. Hedgewar did take part in this movement
and was jailed for that, but that was purely at personal level to be able
to meet the people who might support his agenda of Hindu Rashtra. There is
not a single writing of his or of RSS exhorting the people to participate
in the same. On the contrary there are authoritative references of his
discouraging those who wanted to participate in the struggle for freedom.



What was the RSS leadership attitude to events regarding freedom movement
becomes clear from the quote from M.S. Golwalkar’s, the second
Sarsanghchalak of RSS, says he, “There was some unrest in the mind due to
the situation developing in the country from time to time. There was such
unrest in 1942. Before that there was the movement of 1930-31. At that time
many other people had gone to Doctorji (Hedgewar). The delegation requested
Doctorji that this movement will give Independence and Sangh should not lag
behind. At that time, when a gentleman told Doctorji that he was ready to
go to jail, Doctorji said ‘definitely go, But who will take care of your
family then? That gentleman replied , “I have sufficiently arranged
resources not only to run the family expenses for two years but also to pay
fines according to requirement’, then Doctorji told him ‘If you have fully
arranged for the resources then come out to work for Sangh for two years.’.
After returning home that gentleman neither went to jail nor came out to
work for the Sangh.”



On similar lines during 1942 when the turmoil began Golwlkar issued
instructions that routine work of Sangh should continue and nothing should
be done to annoy the British, “In 1942 also there was a strong sentiment in
the hearts of many. At that time too routine work of Sangh continued. Sangh
vowed not to do anything directly.”  (Both these Quotes from Shri Guruji
Samgra Darshan, Vol IV, page 39-40)This ideologue of RSS clearly spells
that fighting against British has not been part of their agenda, “We should
remember that in our pledge we have talked of freedom of the country
through defending religion and culture, there is no mention of departure of
British from here.”



The same is confirmed by C.P. Bhishikar’s biography of Golwalkar, Shri
Guruji-Pioneer of a new Era, “It was with this clear understanding that the
Sangh, as an organisation, decided not to plunge into the movement. Right
from the beginning, the Sangh has decided to observe certain constraints in
some matters.” (Page 47) “Right from the beginning, the Sangh has decided
to observe certain constraints in some matters. So, when Doctorji decided
to participate in the satyagraha, he directed the Swayamsevaks to keep out
of it and conduct the Shakha work with regularity. He had kept the Sangh as
such out of the agitation
<http://rss.org/Encyc/2015/5/30/328_05_02_30_Shri_Guruji.pdf>.” (page 48)”



Now Sinha wants us to believe that lakhs of volunteers of RSS participated
in 1942 and many of them were punished severely by British. Sangh is known
for its disciplined volunteers, so did RSS volunteers defy their
SarsanghChalak to be part of the movement led by Gandhi? Even the British
intelligence which was the basis of British circular warning the officers
of political nature of Sangh needs to be taken with a pinch of salt as that
was the interpretation of administration which was contrary to what RSS
itself has always maintained that is a cultural organization and not a
political organization.



Till quite late there were no claims of about participation in the struggle
for India’s Independence. It is only once RSS/BJP inched closer to
political power that such claims started being made. One of the earliest
attempts in this direction has been that of our ex Prime Minister Vajpayee.
In the wake of 1998 general elections he had issued an appeal for seeking
votes, he wrote that not only was he working for RSS at shakha level, he
also participated in the freedom movement
<http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl1503/15031150.htm>! . His claim was
around Bateshwar incident where he was arrested. Soon after his arrest he
gave a confessional statement in the court. This statement of his helped
him getting released from jail and it also named the leaders of Bateshwar
campaign, which was part of Quit India Movement. In this confessional
statement Vajpayee says that he had nothing to do with the damages caused
to property which was done by the people who had gone to hoist the tricolor
on the building. He confesses that he was not part of the procession and
was a mere onlooker. Consequent to his apology he was released from the
jail.



Mr. Sinha has fertile imagination and so he can claim that RSS
participation in the Quit India movement was the proverbial last straw for
British rulers. The fact is that that RSS routine work of Shakhas and camps
continued as usual despite some people feeling uncomfortable about the
same. Followers of Gandhi-Congress were on the streets and in jails.



Now RSS is trying to insert itself into the slot where it does not belong.

Ideologically Hindutva political organizations, despite their inner
differences were mainly intent on undermining Muslim nationalism and for
that goal had no problem in cooperating with British. All their efforts
were to ignore the diversity of the nation manifested in Gandhi’s central
slogan of Hindu-Muslim unity. Today a new construct is being brought to
fore for electoral goals, and that is to erase the fact of their absence
from the freedom struggle. At deeper level how could RSS be part of the
movement for Indian nationalism, as RSS aim is totally in contravention to
that as it stands for Hindu nationalism?



-

Edited version of this carried on The Wire

https://thewire.in/172208/did-rss-participate-in-the-freedom-movement/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to