*Who is responsible for India’s Partition and Kashmir Imbroglio?*


*Ram Puniyani*



Political tendencies not only distort and ‘present the past’ to suit their
political agenda; they can go to any extent to even lie about the events
and their interpretation. ‘Facts are sacred; opinions are free’ should have
been the dictum for all those commenting on them, but as they say for the
likes of Modi, ‘all is fair in love and war’. To promote his personal
ambitions and to enhance the impact of his political agenda, he has been
crossing all limits. At one level in order to glorify Sardar Patel; he is
undermining Jawaharlal Nehru, and is trying to create a binary between
them. For him this serves two purposes. One, as ‘Modi parivar’ never
participated in freedom movement they do look for an icon who was a part of
freedom moment, and so have picked up Patel and are trying to appropriate
him, despite the fact that Patel was very clear about the role of Modi’s
ideological parents (Hindu Mahasabha-RSS), in the murder of his mentor,
Mahatma Gandhi, “… as [a] result of the activities of these two bodies [the
RSS and the Hindu Mahasabha], particularly the former, an atmosphere was
created in the country in which such a ghastly tragedy became possible…The
activities of the RSS constituted a clear threat to the existence of the
Government and the State.”

As far as tragic partition of the country is concerned there are so many
scholarly works, which not only tell us the dynamics of India’s partition,
but also throw a light on the complexity of the whole process. Yes, it is
true that the complicated dynamics is so vast that many can pick up as per
their own narrow picture. For the followers of Jinnah it was Congress which
was responsible for India’s partition, and Modi seems to be in the same
boat while putting the blame of partition on Congress and particularly on
Nehru. There are three core reasons for partition tragedy. The biggest
reason has been the British policy of ‘Divides and rule’. British knew that
India’s major leadership is tilted towards socialism and may ally with
Russian socialist block in international affairs. In pursuance of their
imperialist vision they did want to cultivate a country, which can remain
their subservient nation, that’s precisely the role Pakistan played in
international affairs. The major factor assisting this British goal had
been the two nation theory, originally propounded by Savarakar, the
ideological founder of Modi ideology. The third reason had been Jinnah’s
assertion that ‘Muslims are a separate nation ‘, and so we want Pakistan.

Lohia in his major book, *"Guilty Men of India's Partition", writes*: "…
one of the forces that partitioned the country was precisely this Hindu
fanaticism… Those who have shouted loudest about *Akhand Bharat*, the
present Jana Sangh (previous avatar of BJP, added) and its predecessors of
the curiously un-Hindu spirit of Hinduism, have helped Britain and the
Muslim League partition the country. They did nothing whatsoever to bring
the Muslim close to the Hindu within a single nation. They did almost
everything to estrange them from each other. Such estrangement is the root
cause of partition…”

Similarly Jinnah had become more and more rigid about his demand for
separate Pakistan over a period of time. Once Nehru stated that they are
not bound by Cabinet mission plan, Jinnah rigidly adhered to the demand for
Pakistan.

At administrative level while Gandhi; by the time these machinations were
being implemented by the British; was more involved on the ground, dousing
the Hindu Muslim violence, leaving the issue in the hands of Nehru and
Patel, his most trusted followers. Maulana Abul Kalam Azad in his
seminal *"India
Wins Freedom"*, points out that it was Sardar Patel who was the first major
Congress leader to have supported the British plan for India's partition.
Maulana himself never reconciled to the plan of partition, while Gandhi was
the last person to have given a quiet acceptance to this, hoping that it
will be a reversible process. Modi’s own colleague in the Central Cabinet,
MJ Akbar, in his biography of Nehru (1988) *"Nehru - The Making of India"* says
"Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the strong man of India, had accepted the idea
of partition even before Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru, the romantic." (page 406)

One recalls that Jaswant Singh, Modi’s party’s major leader in his book
(‘Jinnah Partition Independence’) did point out about the role of Patel in
acceding to the pressure of circumstances and accepting the partition. It
was due to this that Modi, the then Chief minister of Gujarat, banned this
book in his state.

About Kashmir imbroglio, lesser said the better. It was the creation of
historical circumstances in which a Muslim majority princely state did not
want to merge into Pakistan. In the face of attacks of groups of tribal,
supported by Pakistan army, Maharaja Harisingh sought the help of India to
save the situation. It was Sheikh Abdullah who was most insistent on help
from India. Patel and Nehru were on the same page on this matter. Patel was
even willing for a trade off Kashmir valley. Rajmohan Gandhi in his
biography *"Patel: A Life"*, tells us that Patel was thinking of making an
ideal bargain: if Jinnah lets India have Junagadh and Hyderabad, Patel
would not object to Kashmir acceding to Pakistan. He cites a speech by
Patel at Bahauddin College in Junagadh, following the latter's merger with
India, in which he said: "We would agree to Kashmir if they agreed to
Hyderabad." (Pages 407-8, 438)

The final word on Patel-Nehru relations comes from none other than Father
of the nation, Gandhi. While speaking to Indian Express he said, “Broadly
speaking Nehru and Patel stood together on most issues, including Kashmir.”
Modi is trying to construct this lie and keeps repeating it on most
occasions as, despite being a lie it suits him ideologically.
(Some references courtesy Sudheendra Kulkarni, Modi's Dislike For Nehru
Cannot Obliterate The Facts)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to humanrights-movement+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to humanrights-movement@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to