[image: Image may contain: 3 people, people smiling, people sitting and
outdoor]



USS passe rani hai, iss passe Gandhi!”
(“On that side is the Queen, on this is Gandhi)
(
https://indianexpress.com/elections/patiala-dharamvira-gandhi-aap-elections-2019-bjp-congress-5726029/
)

Nawan Punjab Party’s candidate ex MP Dr Dharamvira Gandhi’s election
campaign and the way he projected his appeal as ‘battle against the royals’
had rightly evoked interest in a section of the media as well as pro-people
circles.(
https://www.newsclick.in/electoral-mobilisation-vehicle-rainbow-social-coalition
)

It is of interest to know that in this era of money and muscle power
politics the campaign was largely run on support generated by people. What
is also notable (-do-) that the campaign was successful in building a
social coalition – cutting across various fissures in our society – and
could challenge “populist fascism of the Bharatiya Janata Party,
patronage-based populism of the Congress, and a fractious identity politics
of SAD which cannot see beyond its narrow aims. “.

Those who know Dharamvira Gandhi cannot but have admiration for his
selfless dedication to the people, for his long and committed association
with the revolutionary left movement, for his lifelong struggle for social
justice, and for his love for the masses. Those who would have seen his
election campaign would see it as a model for how election campaigns should
be run. Given the kind of politicians we have around and the kind of
election campaign we have suffered at the national level, it says a lot
about Dharamvira. There is much to learn for proponents and supporters of
alternative politics from his work as a popular doctor and a
social-political activist.

And yet questions remain. Serious questions remain. Can it be that a good
politics at the local level goes against a desirable politics at the
national or larger level? Can it be that a good fight at the local level
weakens the fight that must be fought against the monstrous enemy at the
national level?

The example of Dharamvira’s close comrade in the AAP days, Yogendra Yadav,
sheds light on the kind of politics that this stream enunciated in 2012-13.
Of course Kejriwal has shown his true colours in the interim years and
there is disillusionment about his brand of politics even among large
sections of his erstwhile followers. But has lessons been learnt? Yogendra
Yadav promoted the NOTA option in these elections and now he wants Congress
to be dead. One desirable death that should be obvious to any right
thinking Indian should be that of the BJP. Win or lose, Congress has been
the main electoral Party challenging the fascistic forces of whom Modi is
the political embodiment. It should be clear that no regional party or
movement, no social movement or none of the existing left forces can defeat
BJP while fighting Congress at the same time. Maintaining equal distance
from both Congress and BJP cannot be a sane politics in the current
electoral arena. To wish death to Congress at this moment – who will be the
ultimate beneficiary?

This example is not unconnected with Gandhi’s political predicament. The
political path he chose six years ago has led him to less than desirable
choices. On the surface there is recognition that Kejriwal represents a
malignant brand of politics. But the deeper logic is still not recognized.
His original choice has tied him to a politics where opposition to BJP and
the Sangh Parivar is far less operative than opposition to Congress. This
does not fit with what should be the politics of someone like Dharamvira
Gandhi who undoubtedly has an impeccable record of service to the people.

Emphasis on federative structure of the Indian republic, (
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/will-fight-for-punjabs-autonomy-within-the-union-pda/article26695687.ece),
on demands of Punjab as a state, on honestly serving the people of a given
parliamentary constituency – all fade in political insignificance when
compared with what must be the central political task and central political
strategy of any progressive politician who has decided to operate in the
electoral arena.

This, then, is the predicament of Dharamvira Gandhi. He does all the
desirable and laudable things at the local level. And yet, all this does
not add up to or contribute to that one good thing that must be
accomplished at the national, at the ideological, and at the strategic
level.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"humanrights movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/humanrights-movement.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/humanrights-movement/CAJGPqcYRhbubokr_K_JPznb_eOB%2BBrhJrLxmYneTYSidyLNLzw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to