_____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 21 December 2012 07:36
To: Digest Recipients
Subject: [HG-new] Digest for [email protected] - 4 Messages in 2
Topics
 
   Today's Topic Summary
Group:  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics>
http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics
*                                Christmas music. the Horses Branle [3
Updates]
*                                irish dancing [1 Update]
  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/2776b212d38c1a11> Christmas
music. the Horses Branle
Tania <[email protected]> Dec 20 03:53PM -0800  

Well said, Arle. I agree wholeheartedly, especially in the case of the 
Chevaux, which is, basically, a nice tune for a very boring dance. The 
other tune Michael refers to, le branle de l'official (to which G. R. 
Woodward set his "Ding Dong Merrily on High" lyric) is, in contrast, a tune 
which is fun and satisfying to play at any tempo. The dance itself is also 
fun. I've always enjoyed playing Official at whatever speed suits whomever 
I'm playing with, be they musicians or dancers, while with Chevaux, 
there's always the inclination to keep stepping up the speed to keep 
musicians and dancers alike from falling asleep![These tunes/dances are
meant to be entertaining not boring, and I have seen this done in France
with great fun and energy. Arbeaux clearly states that you my make any
suitable variations, you can paw the ground whenever you like ( a good place
might be bars .  3&4 of section  2) If you wish to turn it into a masque you
can wear a horses head & neigh!.).  And the drummer will add suitable
rhythms too).. but there must be a formal element too, with no one being
crazy. But work to create interest!
As for the melody, if it is in g minor the only accidental is the
penultimate F#.  on one of your videos someone has clearly misunderstood the
clef and so it is completely wrong. 
I apologize for not giving the source in my original posting, but I
mistakenly assumed that anyone interested in this genre would be acquainted
with the literature.
I try not to  make assumptions and everything I write is based on four
decades of music making, lecturing, writing, teaching and study.  So when I
am thought to be didactic & inflexible it actually has a sound basis.
I have tried to offer general basic musicianship to players in the uk but
they seem to prefer working from half knowledge. If you are only half way up
a mountain you can't see the peak, and when you are there you see yet
another. Gradus ad parnassum (Carnival of the animals). Most people prefer
to bivouac in the low alps.    The basis of making music (as opposed to just
playing notes) is a firm sense of pulse and a sense of musical direction.
The way the notes are joined is important too, as Quantz pointed out: the
notes should not be glued together.
 
I leave you to take your musical pleasure, but I must to bed.
Michael 
 
I thank all parties who have joined in for making this an interesting
discussion. 
 
On Monday, December 17, 2012 9:35:49 PM UTC-9, Arle Lommel wrote:
 
[email protected] Dec 20 07:03PM -0500  

Tania...I never realized that "Ding Dong Merrily on High" is a French dance 
tune (Branle de l'Official)! I can definitely hear it on the gurdy, and 
would love to see the dance. As for Branle des Chevaux, our French dance 
caller has substituted a different dance for that tune...it's done at our 
dances as a circle dance that includes a pawing motion with the foot at one 
point, and it's a lot more fun than the original. No idea if he and his 
partner learned it or invented it. If I come across a video, I'll post the
link. 

Mitch Gordon
Guerneville, California, US



In a message dated 12/20/2012 3:53:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
 
Well said, Arle. I agree wholeheartedly, especially in the case of the 
Chevaux, which is, basically, a nice tune for a very boring dance. The other

tune Michael refers to, le branle de l'official (to which G. R. Woodward 
set his "Ding Dong Merrily on High" lyric) is, in contrast, a tune which is 
fun and satisfying to play at any tempo. The dance itself is also fun. I've 
always enjoyed playing Official at whatever speed suits whomever I'm 
playing with, be they musicians or dancers, while with Chevaux, there's
always 
the inclination to keep stepping up the speed to keep musicians and dancers 
alike from falling asleep!.  [Played at a good tempo with firm rhythm the
tune always fascinates me, esp the min section. which is very strong.
Perhaps your phrasing is wrong or you think of it in the wrong way.]  
 
[email protected] Dec 20 10:56PM -0500  

Here's a video snippet of the dance we do to Branle des Chevaux...not 
rocket science, but enjoyable.
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMJuJ3smsI
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMJuJ3smsI&list=UU_LtSr8oWIhx_Baeqy5RWGw&in
> &list=UU_LtSr8oWIhx_Baeqy5RWGw&in
dex=17_ 
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMJuJ3smsI
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMJuJ3smsI&list=UU_LtSr8oWIhx_Baeqy5RWGw&in
dex=17> &list=UU_LtSr8oWIhx_Baeqy5RWGw&index=17) 



In a message dated 12/20/2012 4:03:49 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
 
Tania...I never realized that "Ding Dong Merrily on High" is a French 
dance tune (Branle de l'Official)! I can definitely hear it on the gurdy,
and 
would love to see the dance. As for Branle des Chevaux, our French dance 
caller has substituted a different dance for that tune...it's done at our 
dances as a circle dance that includes a pawing motion with the foot at one 
point, and it's a lot more fun than the original. No idea if he and his 
partner learned it or invented it. If I come across a video, I'll post the
link. 

Mitch Gordon
Guerneville, California, US



In a message dated 12/20/2012 3:53:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, 
[email protected] writes:
 
Well said, Arle. I agree wholeheartedly, especially in the case of the 
Chevaux, which is, basically, a nice tune for a very boring dance. The other

tune Michael refers to, le branle de l'official (to which G. R. Woodward 
set his "Ding Dong Merrily on High" lyric) is, in contrast, a tune which is 
fun and satisfying to play at any tempo. The dance itself is also fun. I've 
always enjoyed playing Official at whatever speed suits whomever I'm 
playing with, be they musicians or dancers, while with Cheveaux, there's
always 
the inclination to keep stepping up the speed to keep musicians and dancers 
alike from falling asleep!
 
  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/f45fb9a4b40e6c19> irish
dancing
"michael" <[email protected]> Dec 20 09:09PM  

Elizabeth Gilmore <[email protected]> Dec 19 09:00AM -0800 
 
 
Elizabeth.
 
If I understand correctly.. you posted this video to show people not dancing
traditional.....[but of course, similar 16th cent is traditional in France! 
I think the style you call trad is straight line dancing with arms by the
side. This unnatural style was imposed by the church to prevent people
touching, for to do so implied a sexual relationship , which was sinful.
Ring dances such as shown in your video have been around in Euro countries
from the Middle Ages and no doubt beyond. There are handkerchief ring dances
(carols when sung to religious words) where the couple must jointly hold a
handkerchief between them until they are married, for to touch would imply
instant engagement - or worse!. It strikes me as strange that the natural
joy & abandonment you illustrate is against God. I prefer the religious
culture around the Kama Sutra where people take their pleasures in God's
name - a pleasure which brings a peace 'which passeth all understanding.'
Men should think on this when they turn violent. In Scotland 100 years ago
the fiddle was called 'a wee sinful thing' because it was used for dancing,
but a cello was acceptable! (Verbatim)
As ring dances are natural and ancient we should perhaps call them
'traditional' which would certainly be confusing. But dance, like language,
undergoes constant change. I think you should accept both types of dance,
but ring dancing in its various forms will always be more popular because it
is such fun - a bit rumbustious perhaps, but fun for all that. Village
dances were in the past controlled by the elders, who allowed the more
energetic dances bit by bit as the evening wore on. The young were never
allowed to get out of hand. The ends of Fr dances was often signalled by
playing g e f d slowly a few times , thus bringing a controlled & quiet
ending. ] Michael 
I recently talked with a friend who went to Ireland... he is an
accomplished fiddler and was looking forward to finding a session to join
while there... What he said he discovered was that in Ireland there are
different forms of sessions... When he asked a local where the music was
the local said" which do you want? "trad" or one of the other s (I forgot
what he called the others) ... [Modern?]
So any of you that have gone to Ireland.. did you find this true? If so...
the same thing is going on there as is here ....

I enjoy and want to promote tradition... but part of me really enjoys the
fact that there is this music that gets people up and dancing in groups
WITH each other. In France there are many dances which do this (inc 16th
cent)
In this video... even though it is perhaps is not 'traditional'... look how
much
fun they are having and how many people are involved. The music for this
need not be elaborate and may be only one tune constantly repeated on a
small whistle pipe. (E & C Europe)
I have also noticed that the younger generation tends to want to do the
more energetic dancing and will inject that energy into the dance
anyway....I remember doing that myself when I was younger.

AS far as dancing traditional.. maybe no one has actually taught these
people
what the tradtion is... and maybe they think they are dancing as everyone
else does..

So keep them both going, but distinct. The 1st part of the evening cd be
Trad & ending with 'modern' 



<http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/t/5fa63b0b406aaed> Digest for
[email protected] - 8 Messages in 2 Topics
"michael" <[email protected]> Dec 19 12:57PM
 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
hurdygurdy.
You can  <mailto:[email protected]> post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group,
<mailto:[email protected]> send an empty message.
For more options,  <http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy/topics> visit
this group.
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy
 
The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at
http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm. To reduce spam, posts from new
subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy

The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at 
http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm.  To reduce spam, posts from new 
subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.

Reply via email to