Brice Goglin, le Thu 17 Sep 2009 09:50:57 +0200, a écrit : > * Do we actually need hwloc_get_type_order() or would > hwloc_compare_types() be enough? I can't find any example where some > type "orders" is not used for direct comparison.
And the latter is probably clearer, indeed. > * I think the _above_cpuset() and _below_cpuset() function names are not > very clear. I think "inside" may be better that "below" (and rename > get_cpuset_objs into get_objs_inside_cpuset as well and move it nearby). > And maybe use "covering" instead of "above" since we already have > "covering" somewhere else? That should be fine, yes. > Also, we have __hwloc_restrict everywhere in the public API, but also in > the manpages? Should we convert the latter into a regular "restrict" > keyword ? I had tried before already through the .cfg and that didn't work. Since we now have our own Makefile rules, I've just added a sed call, which also does the same for inline btw. > That's all for today :) Better fix this now instead of changing the ABI > after the first hwloc release. Sure :) Samuel
