Brice Goglin wrote: > Hello, > > A couple other things that I am not sure about in the API: >
Everything is done, so I am ok with releasing something now (once the dynamic cpusets will be discussed). We talked about adding the physical distances into the XML output of lstopo, but it requires some non-trivial changes (and some thinking), so I'd rather not put it in 0.9.1. XML backward compatibility shouldn't be too bad anyway (maybe a warning if an unknown/expected node is found, that's it). Brice