Fawzi Mohamed wrote: > NODE 1 > cache2 > cache1 > p0 > cache2 > cache1 > p1 > NODE 2 > cache1 > p2 > cache1 > p3 > > or is it even possible to have a node with children of a single node > of different depth? > > this is supposing that you want to keep that a level has a single type > (and given the api I suppose it is so).
We keep same caches in the same level. So node 2 has children at depth+2 instead of depth+1. Brice
