On Dec 17, 2009, at 6:47 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > I see you added some casts, too. ;) > > Yes, but carefully :p
Fair 'nuff. :-) > > Re make check - I know it exists, but it was difficult to integrate the > > embedded test in with the existing "check" target because the embedded test > > effectively needs a full hwloc tarball to compile against. > > Ok, but you could also just run make check in the standalone version > already. Yes, and you still can (and it works). But it doesn't call the embedded test because of the reasons I mentioned. Note, too, that the "make check" in the top-level directory does not test embedded functionality; that's why I created a specific test for it. If someone can think of how to blend all that stuff together, I'm all ears! :-) -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com
