Brice Goglin, le Thu 07 Jan 2010 19:52:51 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Now, coming to semantic changes: > > - The top node of the tree wouldn't necessarily be a system object. > > Actually, having always the top object having the system type is not > > providing any useful information :) > > And having the root object type vary from machine to system or switch > provides useful information about what kind of topology we're working on.
Mmm, you mean whether it's a networked one or not? Actually it could be argued that a Kerrighed system could rather use a switch object as root (to provide bandwidth information for instance). Samuel
