On Feb 28, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > $ utils/lstopo - > Machine(1509MB) + Socket l#0 + L2 l#0(2048KB) > L1 l#0(32KB) + Core l#0 + P l#0 > L1 l#1(32KB) + Core l#1 + P l#1 > $ utils/lstopo - -p > Machine(1509MB) + Socket p#0 + L2(2048KB) > L1(32KB) + Core p#0 + P p#0 > L1(32KB) + Core p#1 + P p#1
Just curious -- what happened to the #0 for the L1 and L2 cache in the physical display, above? > $ utils/lstopo - -l > Machine(1509MB) + Socket#0l + L2#0l(2048KB) > L1#0l(32KB) + Core#0l + P#0l > L1#1l(32KB) + Core#1l + P#1l > $ utils/lstopo - -p > Machine(1509MB) + Socket#0p + L2(2048KB) > L1(32KB) + Core#0p + P#0p > L1(32KB) + Core#1p + P#1p Same question as above. > I think I prefer the latter. I marginally prefer the former, but don't have a strong opinion -- I can't think of any better option than these two. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
