Bert Wesarg, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 19:39:51 +0100, a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 17:01, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@inria.fr> > wrote: > > Thanks for the idea. > > > > Bert Wesarg, le Fri 26 Mar 2010 12:33:00 +0100, a écrit : > >> +#define HWLOC_HAVE(what) (defined(HWLOC_HAVE_##what) && HWLOC_HAVE_##what) > > > > Unfortunately some compilers (such as gcc 2.95) do not accept this > > What topology information do you get on machines that have this old > compiler installed?
It's not only a question of *that* compiler, but that this kind of tinkering with macros is quite borderline. I actually do wonder whether it is C99 compliant. gcc happens to be able to parse it since at least 3.0, but since 2.95 doesn't, I guess there are some other compilers that won't be able to either. > For example sysfs attributes are very unlikely. > the linux kernel should require at least gcc 3. But I haven't checked > since when. hwloc is not only about Linux ;) Samuel
