On Jul 13, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Dave Goodell wrote: > > How are we doing ABI-wise? (sorry I haven't paid enough attention) Will > > the next Libtool ABI version be 0:2:1? > > Wouldn't that be a nonsensical libtool ABI version string? I read that as > saying: > > "This library exposes interface version 0, revision 2. It also supports > interfaces as far back as -1."
Oops -- you're right. I was thinking age was relevant to the middle number, not the first number. So 0:2:0 (which also explains why it's currently 0:1:0). Thanks! -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
