Do we merge the cuda branch into 1.4? I didn't do the work directly
into the trunk because I wasn't sure of what I'd need to add to the
interface. Eventually, the additions are

- the "tight" field, which just means whether children are tightly packed,
such as cores in an nvidia MultiProcessor, i.e. it's mostly a decorative
attribute for the drawing function.
- the "MEM" object type, which represents embedded memory, not a NUMA node.

Opinions?

Samuel

Reply via email to