Do we merge the cuda branch into 1.4? I didn't do the work directly into the trunk because I wasn't sure of what I'd need to add to the interface. Eventually, the additions are
- the "tight" field, which just means whether children are tightly packed, such as cores in an nvidia MultiProcessor, i.e. it's mostly a decorative attribute for the drawing function. - the "MEM" object type, which represents embedded memory, not a NUMA node. Opinions? Samuel