TERRY DONTJE, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 19:04:34 +0100, a écrit : > On 1/18/2012 12:59 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote: > >On 1/18/2012 12:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >>Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 15:55:18 +0100, a écrit : > >>>I'm getting an issue with the topology-solaris-chiptype.c work on > >>>Solaris 10: in the ProcessorType case, the returned value does not look > >>>like a readable string, I'm getting "¨", which consequently poses > >>>problems in the xml parser. Of course, googling picl_get_propinfo > >>>"ProcessorType" returns... topology-solaris-chiptype.c ... > >>> > >>>Can somebody have a look? > >>using ptrpicl -v, I'm getting > >> > >> :name cpus > >> cpu (cpu, 8900000735) > >> :StateBegin Wed Jan 18 07:18:41 2012 > >> :FPUType<ERROR: Argument too big> > >> :ProcessorType \360\275^T^H > >> > >>which matches what I'm getting with hwloc (0xf0 0xbd 0x14 0x8...) (yes, > >>it's different from by previous report because my job request got > >>another but similar hardware machine). > >Weird, my prtpicl on my v20z (which is a Sun system) has readable fields > >FPUType and ProcessorType. > >However, I am using an older S10 Generic_120012-11. I'll see if I can > >find something newer to try. > > > >--td > Just tried an S10 Generic_144489-05 which has the same version of picl > packages as you show below. The system is showing readable fields, unlike > yours. > > I can only infer that there must be some issue with compatibility between > Dell platforms and S10's initialization of the picl information.
Ok, I'll ignore this test failure then. Samuel
