On 2/8/2012 4:43 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit :
On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
Option #4:
CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0.
That still looks dangerous to me: we don't know whatever warning
might be added in the future. I'd rather add -qhalt=e only for the
sched_setaffinity test.
I don't recommend adding -qsuppress automatically, just documenting it for
users that need xlc-8 or xlc-9.
I'm not actually talking about the -qsuppress, but about still using
-qhalt=e, which might make a lot more other warnings fatal.
Right.
I realized that about 10 seconds after hitting SEND and was composing a
retraction when the post above arrived.
-Paul
--
Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
HPC Research Department Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Fax: +1-510-486-6900
