I can/will, but not until after SC.  :-(

On Nov 8, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:

> Did anybody look at leastc at the documentation links below?
> I am willing to merge this tomorrow. I split the merge into several
> commits to make things more bisectable in case of problems.
> 
> Brice
> 
> 
> 
> Le 02/11/2012 17:51, Brice Goglin a écrit :
>> I pushed big changes to the components in the last days (what came from
>> last month discussion + recent CPUModel feature requests).
>> 
>> Now we ombine information from multiple "cpu" backends. For instance the
>> x86 backend will add socket CPUModel to what native OS backends did.
>> Aside from xml/synthetic/custom excluding everything else, other
>> backends let others try to complete the topology if they have something
>> to add/annotate.
>> 
>> Only component management has changed. Their "pluginification" is still
>> the same as earlier.
>> 
>> Old "core" components are now called "disc" for discovery (that's all
>> they do, binding doesn't need to be componentified).
>> 
>> Instead of describing everything, here are pointers to the new
>> documentation:
>> https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/browser/branches/components/doc/hwloc.doxy
>> Lines 1635-1725 for how it works from the user side
>> Lines 974-1011 for environment variables
>> 
>> 
>> The components branch has a ugly SVN history now. Hopefully SVN will
>> combine all that history into one single commit and nobody will see the
>> ugly components history (except people using git-svn maybe).
>> 
>> Brice
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-devel mailing list
>> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


Reply via email to