Le 07/01/2013 14:35, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Brice Goglin, le Mon 31 Dec 2012 10:05:41 +0100, a écrit : >> - They add OS devices such as opencl0p0, > I see that platform 0 device 3 would be called opencl3p0. I find it > counterintuitive, and would have rather called it opencl0d3, along the > line of sda3, eth0:3, socket:2.core:0, etc. >
I don't have any strong opinion here. I wasn't convinced by any of my ideas when I committed this. It looks like most OpenCL machines will have multiple platforms (one for CPU and one for GPU/accelerator) so we have to always keep the platform in the name. I'll be ok with whichever of XpY or YdX or pYdX or anything better. Ideally, we could even have a OS device for each OpenCL platform, each containing OS devices for devices of the platform. But I'd rather keep a single level to match other OS devices. Brice
