Brice Goglin, le Tue 23 Apr 2013 19:12:08 +0200, a écrit : > I assume that libtool doesn't add a rpath when you install in standard > directories?
Yes, it's doing stuff to detect with paths are actually already in the standard search dirs. > If /usr/lib64 is the default path for 64bits libs on Fedora, shouldn't > somebody > take care of removing the corresponding rpath too? libtool should be already doing that. > This is likely related (but the reversed case) to the comment about Fedora in > http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue. One link on that page says that rerunning > libtoolize before configure may help. Can you try that? (maybe compare the new > libtool script with the one from the hwloc tarball to check that some lib64 > things appeared?) > > > □ If the application uses a local copy of libtool, add the following > lines to the spec after %configure:=> it will make tests FAIL (without > this change, it runs just fine - all tests are PASSED) > > FAIL: test-hwloc-annotate.sh > FAIL: test-hwloc-assembler.sh > PASS: test-hwloc-calc.sh > PASS: test-hwloc-distances.sh > PASS: test-hwloc-distrib.sh > FAIL: test-hwloc-info.sh > > > I am not sure why some fail while the other succeed. You may need to set > LD_LIBRARY_PATH to fix this? The libtool script is supposed to automatically add it. It would probably be worth running by hand to see what actually fails. Samuel
