I don't think libltdl has a .pc. :( Sent from my phone. No type good.
On May 8, 2013, at 2:26 AM, "Brice Goglin" <brice.gog...@inria.fr<mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>> wrote: Le 08/05/2013 02:47, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : How's this patch? The only question I have is: how do we figure out what libraries to put in the .pc file in the --disable-shared --enable-static case? There should be a ltdl.pc for this. But I don't see any. Is there a standard way to extract this line from ltdl.la ? dependency_libs=' -ldl' How about we do not support plugins when --enable-static is given? Brice On May 7, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@inria.fr><mailto:samuel.thiba...@inria.fr> wrote: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Wed 08 May 2013 02:21:02 +0200, a écrit : On May 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr><mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: I don't have anything against this. What was the reason for not using the default/system libltdl in OMPI? libtool was buggy when you started using it? I neglected to answer this. Yes, plus libltdl grew new functionality that we needed (global/local symbol visibility). We might be getting to the point soon where we can rely on the installed libltdl to be new enough everywhere, but we haven't had that conversation. We could already check that the installed version is new enough for our needs. Samuel _______________________________________________ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org<mailto:hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel _______________________________________________ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org<mailto:hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel _______________________________________________ hwloc-devel mailing list hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org<mailto:hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
