-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 27/08/13 00:07, Brice Goglin wrote:

> But there's a more general problem here, some people may want
> something similar for other cases. I need to think about it.

Something like a sort order perhaps, combined with some method to
exclude or weight PUs based on some metrics (including a user defined
weight)?

I had a quick poke around looking at /proc/irq/*/ and it would appear
you can gather info about which CPUs are eligible to handle IRQs from
the smp_affinity bitmask (or smp_affinity_list).

The node file there just "shows the node to which the device using the
IRQ reports itself as being attached. This hardware locality
information does not include information about any possible driver
locality preference."

cheers,
Chris
- -- 
 Christopher Samuel        Senior Systems Administrator
 VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
 Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
 http://www.vlsci.org.au/      http://twitter.com/vlsci

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIcF/QACgkQO2KABBYQAh/7oQCcDSLlgEJqBGDerUD481ho6UWc
Rp0AnRC4cC/Kdhwe75tgg1O/LrcfxXM0
=r4pj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to