That would be perfect! Thanks On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Should be easy on Linux, sure. > The model name is already known as CPUModel in hwloc. > We should likely add CPUVendor (would be GenuineIntel or AuthenticAMD), > CPUFamily (or CPUFamilyNumber if there's a name for these families?) and > CPUModelNumber ? > > Brice > > > > > Le 23/01/2014 19:09, Ralph Castain a écrit : >> Hi folks >> >> Looking at the current topology info, I see you capture the model name for >> the socket, but not a couple of other key things Intel could use: >> >> cpu family : 6 >> model : 44 >> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz >> >> >> Both the cpu family and model are important to us - any issue with adding >> them to the "infos" array? >> >> Ralph >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hwloc-devel mailing list >> hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel > > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-devel mailing list > hwloc-de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-devel
