I couldn't compile trunk (rather, autogen.sh failed because it requires Autoconf > 2.63), so I just pulled the nightly build hwloc-1.0a1r1682 and applied the patch there. Does that sound reasonable?
I've attached the new (much more verbose) result of lstopo. Thanks, Dan -----Original Message----- From: hwloc-users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:hwloc-users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:09 AM To: Hardware locality user list Subject: Re: [hwloc-users] No caches or hiearchy on RHEL 4.7 or 4.8 Dan Eaton, le Thu 28 Jan 2010 11:03:07 -0700, a écrit : > If I go through the API (which I would do anyway, I just wanted a > "taste" with lstopo), can I choose to override information reported by > the OS (i.e. go straight to CPUID), or do I still require the patch in > this case? The x86 backend is very recent, I haven't implemented any interface to override the information with the CPUID information yet, but I guess we'll plan to do it. > Unfortunately that version of x86info requires glibc 2.4 -- RHEL 4.x only has > 2.3.4. Ok, then please run with my patch and passing --enable-debug to ./configure, lstopo will give the APIC IDs. Samuel _______________________________________________ hwloc-users mailing list hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
lstopo.out
Description: lstopo.out
