Wheeler, Kyle Bruce, le Mon 07 Jun 2010 10:10:04 -0600, a écrit : > As I'm sure you know, while Apple doesn't provide strict "bind to CPU X" > functions, they do at least (on Leopard and later) provide the ability to > associate tasks/threads together (or explicitly disassociate them).
Yes, it's an interesting interface. > Would it be a good idea to support these as some sort of make-do? Or would it > simply prompt too many complaints along the lines of "hey, I said bind to cpu > 0 and my program ran on cpu 3! what gives?!?" But how would that work? There is no relation with cpus in that interface. Samuel
