Le 05/11/2010 13:26, ryuuta a écrit : > Hi Brice, > > Thanks for the patch. > I applied your new patch after undoing the previous patch, > rebuilt hwloc, and 'lstopo oroppas.xml' to make sure oroppas.xml > contains a single line of "page_type" with the same size and count. > I double-checked 'make check' passed without an error. > I think it's good to go. > > Thanks for the fix!
Thanks for testing, I am pushing this to trunk and the 1.1 branch now. > Out of curiosity, how can I check whether my kernel has the hugepage > support or not? Look for CONFIG_HUGE is your config file (either /boot/config-$(uname -r) or .config in the kernel source directory Brice > > Regards, > Ryuta > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr > <mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>> wrote: > > Here's a proper patch that should fix your problem without > breaking hugepages support. Can you do what's below again? > > thanks, > Brice > > > > Le 05/11/2010 08:33, ryuuta a écrit : >> OK. I applied the patch and rebuilt hwloc. >> Then, I did 'lstopo oroppas' to produce oroppas.xml. >> The output xml file only contains a single "page_type" lne as you >> indicated. >> And I ran 'make check' to confirm all the tests passed. >> >> Thank you for the fixes! >> >> Regards, >> Ryuta >> >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brice Goglin >> <brice.gog...@inria.fr <mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>> wrote: >> >> Interesting, you don't have any hugepage information, it's >> probably disabled in the kernel. Can you apply th attached >> patch and check that the XML output only contains a single >> "page_type" line and that it looks valid ? It should be >> something like >> <page_type size="4096" count="256834"/> >> If so, then rerun make check again. >> >> thanks, >> Brice >> >> >> >> Le 05/11/2010 07:55, ryuuta a écrit : >>> Here they are. >>> Thanks for the diagnosis. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ryuta >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Brice Goglin >>> <brice.gog...@inria.fr <mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like you have some unexpected hugepage >>> information. Not sure it's the cause of the XML problem, >>> but we need to debug this too. Can you send the .tar.bz2 >>> and .output file that hwloc-gather-topology.sh generates ? >>> >>> In the meantime, I need to change this test so as to >>> show the difference between the XML exports when this >>> make check test fails. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Brice >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 05/11/2010 07:35, ryuuta a écrit : >>>> Here you go. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Brice Goglin >>>> <brice.gog...@inria.fr <mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Looks like there's something specific to your >>>> machine. Can you send the XML output of lstopo ? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> Brice >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 05/11/2010 05:41, ryuuta a écrit : >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to report the failure of the one of the >>>>> tests run by 'make check': >>>>> >>>>> exported to buffer 0x8546408 length 3070 >>>>> re-exported to buffer 0x854ce70 length 3047 >>>>> lt-xmlbuffer: ../../hwloc/tests/xmlbuffer.c:36: >>>>> main: Assertion `size1 == size2' failed. >>>>> /bin/sh: line 5: 14531 Aborted >>>>> ${dir}$tst >>>>> FAIL: xmlbuffer >>>>> ======================================================== >>>>> 1 of 19 tests failed >>>>> Please report to >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/help/ >>>>> ======================================================== >>>>> >>>>> I'm using gcc-4.5.1, libxml2-2.7.7, and zlib-1.2.5. >>>>> The revision of hwloc checked out from svn is: 2702 >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ryuta >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> hwloc-users mailing list >>>>> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org <mailto:hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org> >>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
