Yes of course: char*bitmap_string[256];
hwloc_cpuset_t set = hwloc_bitmap_alloc(); int return_value = hwloc_get_last_cpu_location(topology, set, HWLOC_CPUBIND_THREAD); printf( " bitmap_string: %s \n", bitmap_string[0]); give me: 0x00000800 converted in binary: 100000000000 So, CPU 0 I suppose, but is not where i bound my thread .. :( 2011/8/10 Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@inria.fr> > Gabriele Fatigati, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:29:43 +0200, a écrit : > > hwloc_obj_t core = hwloc_get_obj_by_type(topology, HWLOC_OBJ_MACHINE, 0); > > > > int return_value = hwloc_get_last_cpu_location(topology, core->cpuset, > > HWLOC_CPUBIND_THREAD); > > > > and now in "core->cpuset" I get the new cpuset bitmap, where > process/threads > > runs. Is it right? > > Err, yes, but why using core->cpuset?? Giving it as parameter to > hwloc_get_last_cpu_location will only overwrite its content with the > content returned by hwloc_get_last_cpu_location (which is forbidden, see > the documentation of the cpuset field). > > Samuel > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users > -- Ing. Gabriele Fatigati HPC specialist SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy www.cineca.it Tel: +39 051 6171722 g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it
