so, set_membind() merged with HWLOC_MEMBIND_BIND is useless?

The behaviour I want to set is it possible?

2011/9/25 Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>

> Le 25/09/2011 20:57, Gabriele Fatigati a écrit :
> > after done this, memory is allocated not in a local node of thread
> > that does set_membind and malloc, but in node of  thread that touches
> > it. And I don't understand this behaviour :(
> Memory is allocated when first-touched. If there's no area-specific
> policy, it's allocated according to the policy of the thread that
> touches, not according to the policy of the one that did malloc. If you
> want to follow the malloc'er thread, you have to touch right after malloc.
> Brice
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing list
> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users

Ing. Gabriele Fatigati

HPC specialist

SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department

Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy

www.cineca.it                    Tel:   +39 051 6171722

g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it

Reply via email to