Ok, so, set_membind() merged with HWLOC_MEMBIND_BIND is useless?
The behaviour I want to set is it possible? 2011/9/25 Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> > Le 25/09/2011 20:57, Gabriele Fatigati a écrit : > > after done this, memory is allocated not in a local node of thread > > that does set_membind and malloc, but in node of thread that touches > > it. And I don't understand this behaviour :( > > Memory is allocated when first-touched. If there's no area-specific > policy, it's allocated according to the policy of the thread that > touches, not according to the policy of the one that did malloc. If you > want to follow the malloc'er thread, you have to touch right after malloc. > > Brice > > > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users > -- Ing. Gabriele Fatigati HPC specialist SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy www.cineca.it Tel: +39 051 6171722 g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it