Hi Brice,

the initial grep is:

numa_policy        65671  65952     24  144    1 : tunables  120   60    8
: slabdata    458    458      0

When set_membind fails is:

numa_policy          482   1152     24  144    1 : tunables  120   60    8
: slabdata      8      8    288

What does it means?



2012/9/6 Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>

>  Le 06/09/2012 12:19, Gabriele Fatigati a écrit :
>
> I did't find any strange number in /proc/meminfo.
>
>  I've noted that the program fails exactly
> every 65479 hwloc_set_area_membind. So It sounds like some kernel limit.
> You can check that also just one thread.
>
>  Maybe never has not noted them  because usually we bind a large amount
> of contiguos memory few times, instead of small and non contiguos pieces of
> memory many and many times.. :(
>
>
> If you have root access, try (as root)
>     watch -n 1 grep numa_policy /proc/slabinfo
> Put a sleep(10) in your program when set_area_membind() fails, and don't
> let your program exit before you can read the content of /proc/slabinfo.
>
> Brice
>
>
>
>
>
>  2012/9/6 Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>
>
>> Le 06/09/2012 10:44, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> > Gabriele Fatigati, le Thu 06 Sep 2012 10:12:38 +0200, a écrit :
>> >> mbind hwloc_linux_set_area_membind()  fails:
>> >>
>> >> Error from HWLOC mbind: Cannot allocate memory
>> > Ok. mbind is not really supposed to allocate much memory, but it still
>> > does allocate some, to record the policy
>> >
>> >> //        hwloc_obj_t obj = hwloc_get_obj_by_type(topology,
>> HWLOC_OBJ_NODE, tid);
>> >>         hwloc_obj_t obj = hwloc_get_obj_by_type(topology,
>> HWLOC_OBJ_PU, tid);
>> >>         hwloc_cpuset_t cpuset = hwloc_bitmap_dup(obj->cpuset);
>> >>         hwloc_bitmap_singlify(cpuset);
>> >>         hwloc_set_cpubind(topology, cpuset, HWLOC_CPUBIND_THREAD);
>> >>
>> >>         for( i = chunk*tid; i < len; i+=PAGE_SIZE) {
>> >> //           res = hwloc_set_area_membind_nodeset(topology, &array[i],
>> PAGE_SIZE, obj->nodeset, HWLOC_MEMBIND_BIND, HWLOC_MEMBIND_THREAD);
>> >>              res = hwloc_set_area_membind(topology, &array[i],
>> PAGE_SIZE, cpuset, HWLOC_MEMBIND_BIND, HWLOC_MEMBIND_THREAD);
>> > and I'm afraid that calling set_area_membind for each page might be too
>> > dense: the kernel is probably allocating a memory policy record for each
>> > page, not being able to merge adjacent equal policies.
>> >
>>
>>  It's supposed to merge VMA with same policies (from what I understand in
>> the code), but I don't know if that actually works.
>> Maybe Gabriele found a kernel bug :)
>>
>> Brice
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hwloc-users mailing list
>> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
>>
>
>
>
>  --
> Ing. Gabriele Fatigati
>
> HPC specialist
>
> SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department
>
> Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy
>
> www.cineca.it                    Tel:   +39 051 6171722
>
> g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing 
> listhwloc-users@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-users mailing list
> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users
>



-- 
Ing. Gabriele Fatigati

HPC specialist

SuperComputing Applications and Innovation Department

Via Magnanelli 6/3, Casalecchio di Reno (BO) Italy

www.cineca.it                    Tel:   +39 051 6171722

g.fatigati [AT] cineca.it

Reply via email to