On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I think I am going to agree. Three comments: > * which "binding fails" do you refer to? I assume all cases I listed.
Yes. > * I was initially against changing the default behavior of hwloc-bind, > but it's not like changing the ABI. There are likely very few scripts > using hwloc-bind out there. Breaking some of them is not too bad as long > as we give a useful error message. Agreed. > * If we start failing because of invalid inputs in hwloc-bind, we may > have to do the same in hwloc-calc. The parsing code is shared anyway. I think the philosophy should apply to all executables, actually. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
