On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@inria.fr>wrote:
> Sebastian Kuzminsky, le Sat 06 Oct 2012 00:55:57 +0200, a écrit :
> > binding to CPU0
> > could not bind to CPU0: Resource deadlock avoided
>
> Mmm, from what I read in the freebsd kernel:
>
> /*
> * Create a set in the space provided in 'set' with the provided
> parameters.
> * The set is returned with a single ref. May return EDEADLK if the set
> * will have no valid cpu based on restrictions from the parent.
> */
>
> _cpuset_create(struct cpuset *set, struct cpuset *parent, const cpuset_t
> *mask,
> cpusetid_t id)
> {
>
> if (!CPU_OVERLAP(&parent->cs_mask, mask))
> return (EDEADLK);
>
> Could it be that due to administration rules lstopo is not allowed to
> bind on cpu 0-9 ? In that case the x86 backend can not detect anything
> there.
>
Hm. It may be that we're doing something funny and reserving those CPUs.
I'll run some tests on Monday and get back to you.
