Current BIOS version could be improperly detecting CPUs, which engineering samples of 6348 (all characteristics are same).
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Yury Vorobyov <teupol...@gmail.com> wrote: > The BIOS has latest version. If I should check some BIOS information, I > have access to hardware. Tell me what variables from SMBIOS you want to see? > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Your BIOS reports invalid L3 cache information. On these processors, the >> L3 is shared by 6 cores, it covers 6 cores of an entire half-socket NUMA >> node. But the BIOS says that some L3 are shared between 4 cores, others by >> 6 cores. And worse it says that some L3 is shared by some cores from a NUMA >> node and others from another NUMA nodes, which causes the error message >> (and these L3 cannot be inserted in the topology). >> >> I see "AMD Eng Sample, ZS268145TCG54_32/26/20_2/16" in the processor >> type, so it might explain why your BIOS is somehow experimental. See if you >> can upgrade it. >> >> Also make sure your kernel isn't too old in case it misses L3 info for >> these processors. At least 3.3 should be OK iirc. >> >> NUMA node sharing info: >> $ cat sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpumap >> 00000000,0000003f >> 00000000,00000fc0 >> 00000000,0003f000 >> 00000000,00fc0000 >> $ cat sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu{?,??}/cache/index3/shared_cpu_map >> 00000000,0000000f << wrong, should be 003f >> 00000000,0000000f << wrong, should be 003f >> 00000000,0000000f << wrong, should be 003f >> 00000000,0000000f << wrong, should be 003f >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 003f >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 003f >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,000003f0 <<impossible, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,00000c00 <<wrong, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,00000c00 <<wrong, should be 0fc0 >> 00000000,00003000 <<wrong, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,00003000 <<wrong, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 003f000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 0fc0000 >> 00000000,000fc000 <<impossible, should be 0fc0000 >> 00000000,00f00000 <<wrong, should be 0fc0000 >> 00000000,00f00000 <<wrong, should be 0fc0000 >> 00000000,00f00000 <<wrong, should be 0fc0000 >> 00000000,00f00000 <<wrong, should be 0fc0000 >> >> Brice >> >> >> >> Le 31/01/2014 03:46, Yury Vorobyov a écrit : >> >> I have got error about "intersecting caches". >> >> Info from hwloc in attachments. >> >> I never got this before. I use "live" builds of OpenMPI directly from >> repo. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hwloc-users mailing >> listhwloc-users@open-mpi.orghttp://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hwloc-users mailing list >> hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users >> > >