Canada permits U.S. waste to flood in

Report cites open-pit dumping regulations that allow disposal of untreated
pollutants
MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT

Monday, June 25, 2001


Lax provincial environment policies that allow open-pit dumping of untreated
toxic material make Canada, and particularly the Ontario city of Sarnia, a
haven for U.S. hazardous waste, a draft Environment Canada report says.

The Canadian disposal practices have been banned in the United States
because they are considered unsafe. In the United States, hazardous
materials must be treated through expensive processes such as incineration,
to diminish their toxicity, before landfilling.

The study concluded that the tough U.S. rules encouraged many companies to
move their waste to Canada for cheap disposal, rather than spend money
treating it.

According to the Environment Canada report, 30 per cent of all the dangerous
U.S. waste shipped into Canada during 1998 ended up in Sarnia to be disposed
of in a landfill or incinerator that was owned by the Safety-Kleen company.

The low value of the Canadian dollar and the location of the site near the
United States contributed to the waste flow, the report said, but it wasn't
the only reason.

"The fact that specific wastes shipped to Sarnia for landfill are restricted
from landfilling in the U.S. indicates that a significant factor in the
decision of U.S. generators to use this facility was the lower cost of
landfilling as compared to incineration," it said.

According to figures provided by the Ontario Ministry of Environment, the
Safety-Kleen landfill accepted 115,000 tonnes of U.S. hazardous waste in
1998. The figure rose to 205,000 tonnes in 1999, but then fell to 90,000
tonnes last year.

However, it cautioned that many other companies received U.S. waste covered
by the land-disposal ban.
The report, which was obtained by the federal New Democratic Party using the
Access to Information Act, reviews the hazardous-waste traffic between
Canada and the United States from 1989 to 1998. It was compiled in March,
2000.

It further highlights the role of Canada as a North American dumping ground
for hazardous industrial waste. Another study, released last month by a
Texas environmental-policy group, found that in 1999 Quebec and Ontario each
imported more toxic waste from the United States than did Mexico.

But it says Canadian hazardous-waste importers use such broad
classifications when they report what is in the dangerous materials they
receive that "it is difficult to quantify wastes imported by other Canadian
treatment facilities for ultimate disposal in a landfill."

Canada doesn't have a federal rule similar to the U.S. landfill ban and
disposal practices here are regulated by the provinces. Ontario and Quebec
allow the dumping of untreated hazardous waste in landfills, contending that
well-designed dumps offer a safe way to dispose of toxic materials.

The United States changed its laws because dumps sometimes leak, allowing
their contents of cancer-causing and other toxic materials to leach into
groundwater. The threat to water is reduced by the U.S. treatment
requirement.

The federal report was titled Analysis of Canadian Imports and Exports of
Hazardous Wastes. It was compiled by Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd., an
Ottawa-based consulting firm.

The federal government also identified a questionable activity by some
unnamed Canadian companies that mixed toxic chlorinated solvents and
pesticides with waste fuel, then shipped this material to the United States
to fuel cement kilns.

U.S. rules require pesticides and chlorinated solvents to be destroyed in
hazardous-waste incinerators at greater cost.

"It is not uncommon for waste materials to be blended, and shipped to a
cement kiln in the U.S. where a similar practice would not be permitted if
the waste had been generated in the U.S.," the report says.

Canadian companies can get away with the practice because of sloppy tracking
of the source and content of hazardous waste, according to the report.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/gam/National/20010625/UTOXIN.html


Miroslav Antic,
http://www.antic.org/

THE END

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrHhl.bVKZIr
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [email protected]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to