On Tuesday 29 December 2009 14:41, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote : > a lot of usefull and smart words !
what about this : instead of - lock - memcpy - move indexes - unlock do this - lock - moves indexes - unlock - memcpy IMHO it's good enough if the ring size is well ... sized. priority inversion could still happend, ... not if the lock operation is something else then a pthread_lock, but something like a: for(;;) tas(this,and,that); regards Jeremy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
