Am Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:44:28 +0200 schrieb thijs van severen <thijsvanseve...@gmail.com>:
> 2011/4/13 m.wolkst...@gmx.de <m.wolkst...@gmx.de> > > > Am Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:09:15 +0200 > > schrieb thijs van severen <thijsvanseve...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thijs van severen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Chema > > > > > I have comitted these screenshots in branches/0.9.5 > > > > > > > > > Thijs, please check your commits. It seems that you did something wrong > > > > there.. > > > > First of all, you committed rev. 2198 to the tag and not to the branch. > > > > And rev. 2199 looks strange: > > > > http://trac.assembla.com/hydrogen/changeset/2199. > > > > I'm not sure what exactly happened there. > > > > - Sebastian > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sebastian > > > my mistake : i committed 2198 to tags/0.9.5 iso branches/0.9.5 > > > should i remove the file from tags/0.9.5 and check it in on > > branches/0.9.5 ? > > joho, > > i do some work here. > > i merge all last commits to trunk and the wrong commit to tags into > > branches/0.9.5. > > so all is fine(up to date) in branches/0.9.5. > > we only have to revert commit 2198 - 2199 in tags/0.9.5. i also can do > > this! > > > > reverting 2198 : OK > reverting 2199 was not in tags but in branches, so i dont think this one > needs to be reverted ? > (although that commit did look rather strange) commit 2199 was in tags/0.9.5! see here: http://trac.assembla.com/hydrogen/log/tags/0.9.5 but commit 2199 is simple an empty commit. greetings wolke > > grtz > Thijs > > > > > > > about 2199 : it does look strange ! but it seems that the upload worked > > > since the new screenshots are in /branches/0.9.5/data/doc/tutorial_img > > > maybe it is because i used the old file names (so the old screenshots > > where > > > 'overwritten' by the new screenshots that have the exact same names as > > the > > > old ones)? > > > > > > grtz > > > Thijs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and > > minutes > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report > > as > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and > > vision. > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Hydrogen-devel mailing list > > > > Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > _______________________________________________ > > Hydrogen-devel mailing list > > Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
