Hi Sebastian, I agree, I think the <major>.<minor>.<patchlevel> format is fairly widespread and well understood. It makes it easier to identify releases in the cases of patches to potentially multiple branches.
The only downside I see is the potential for confusion between "1.0.1" and "1.1" but that can easily be avoided by making there are 2 patch releases to 1.0 before releasing 1.1 ;) On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 13:53, <mau...@smoors.de> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > with 1.0 released, we should think about the version number for the next > version of hydrogen. Following the "usual" Hydrogen version scheme, we > would end up with 1.0.1. In my opinion, this feels not really intutive > for the end user and 1.1 might be more "common", with a last number > reserved for patch releases (like 1.1.5). Any opinions on this topic? > > Best regards, > Sebastian > > > _______________________________________________ > Hydrogen-devel mailing list > Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel > -- C.
_______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list Hydrogen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
