Hi kuer,

I don't see any problem with the log snippet that you give below.  The "clgc
LOG FRAGMENT PURGE" messages are just leftover debugging statements that I
forgot to remove in a recent checkin.  Are you  experiencing a real problem
with the database?  If so, what is the symptom?

- Doug

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:48 PM, kuer <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I found lots of message in rangeserver's log :
>
> 2009-07-08 07:30:23,198 1231112512 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> 2009-07-08 07:30:23,198 1231112512 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 322964958 bytes
> 2009-07-08 07:30:43,197 1336011072 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> 2009-07-08 07:31:03,198 1199642944 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> 2009-07-08 07:31:03,198 1199642944 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> 2009-07-08 07:31:23,197 1294051648 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 323476974 bytes
> 2009-07-08 07:31:43,198 1178663232 Hypertable.RangeServer [WARN] (Lib/
> CommitLog.cc:250) clgc LOG FRAGMENT PURGE breaking because
> 1247008867417054087 >= 1247003041037972148 (file='/hypertable/servers/
> 221.194.134.176_31060/log/user/75')
> 2009-07-08 07:31:43,198 1178663232 Hypertable.RangeServer [INFO]
> (RangeServer/RangeServer.cc:2032) Memory Usage: 324501006 bytes
>
> It seems that it will be never end.
>
> I want to know :
> 1. How this happened? why to purge a future revision?
> 2. How to resolve/correct this problem?
>    From the purge() function,  the thread will stop purging if
> meeting with the 'fucture' revision, and purge() will end.  The
> 'future' revision data is still there; when purging next time, it will
> complain it again.
>    What's the rationale behind this?
>   Would someone tell me kindly?
>
>   Thanks.
>
> -- kuer
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hypertable Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to