Hi David, The table updates can be performed in parallel in multiple different ways:
- You can use an asynchronous mutator in a single thread. - You can use synchronous mutators in multiple threads - You can use synchronous mutators in multiple processes The key is that you want the updates to be happening *at the same time*. - Doug On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:14 AM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, i have understood your mean. > My application starts multiple threads, per thread uses the synchronous > mutator to update sequentially two tables. It looks i need to use the > asynchronous mutator in order to improve the writing speed, is it right? > BTW, because multiple threads can only share a Hypertable::Client object, > if changing multiple threads to multiple processes, whether or not the > writing speed can be improved? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hypertable Development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Doug Judd CEO, Hypertable Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hypertable Development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hypertable-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
